OOPS! Re: Draft IETF X400-OPS minutes of the Columbus meeting
Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com> Thu, 15 April 1993 06:51 UTC
Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00956; 15 Apr 93 2:51 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00952; 15 Apr 93 2:51 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa01053; 15 Apr 93 2:51 EDT
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <07775-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Thu, 15 Apr 1993 01:39:48 +0000
Received: from ics.uci.edu by cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 15 Apr 93 01:39:37 -0500
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id ab08374; 14 Apr 93 23:38 PDT
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa15710; 14 Apr 93 16:30 PDT
To: Tony Genovese <genovese@ophelia.nersc.gov>
Cc: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu, Eppenberger@switch.ch
Subject: OOPS! Re: Draft IETF X400-OPS minutes of the Columbus meeting
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 14 Apr 1993 16:16:10 -0000." <9304142115.AA15625@ophelia.nersc.gov>
Reply-To: Stef@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef@nma.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 1993 16:30:58 -0700
Message-Id: <15708.734830258@odin.nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com
A correction in the Action List...
} 11 Einar Stefferud to integrate the final comments to the document
} draft-ietf-x400ops-evaluation-admd-00.txt and then send it to the
^^^^^^^^^^^ ^
} IESG Secretariat for consideration as Informational RFC.
According to the last published Internet Draft version:
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 1993 08:25:03 EST
Subject: ID ACTION:draft-ietf-x400ops-admd-01.txt
From: Internet-Drafts@cnri.reston.va.us
Title : Assertion of C=US; A=IMX
Author(s) : E. Stefferud
Filename : draft-ietf-x400ops-admd-01.txt
Pages : 7
draft-ietf-x400ops-evaluation-admd-00.txt should be
draft-ietf-x400ops-admd-01.txt
Also, while I am in here -- I have some questions:
I will be doing the final edits. Can someone please tell me what
procedure is used to submit this to the IESG?
Should I do this through Erik Huizer, or to IESG with a CC to Erik?
Should I ask the RFC Editor for a review before, or after sending it
to the IESG?
Is there any document that provides guidance for this process?
Believe it or not, I have been a co-author on several RFCs but never
the sole author, so I have never done this before;-)...\Stef
- Draft IETF X400-OPS minutes of the Columbus meeti… Urs Eppenberger
- Re: Draft IETF X400-OPS minutes of the Columbus m… (Tony Genovese)
- OOPS! Re: Draft IETF X400-OPS minutes of the Colu… Einar Stefferud
- Re: OOPS! Re: Draft IETF X400-OPS minutes of the … Erik Huizer