Re: Government of Canada X.400/SMTP Gateway

Einar Stefferud <Stef=x400@nma.com> Thu, 08 April 1993 09:47 UTC

Received: from ietf.nri.reston.va.us by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00888; 8 Apr 93 5:47 EDT
Received: from CNRI.RESTON.VA.US by IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa00884; 8 Apr 93 5:47 EDT
Received: from mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu by CNRI.Reston.VA.US id aa03891; 8 Apr 93 5:47 EDT
Received: from cs.wisc.edu by mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu with SMTP (PP) id <14571-0@mhs-relay.cs.wisc.edu>; Thu, 8 Apr 1993 04:26:54 +0000
Received: from ics.uci.edu by cs.wisc.edu; Thu, 8 Apr 93 04:26:50 -0500
Received: from nma.com by q2.ics.uci.edu id af24099; 8 Apr 93 2:25 PDT
Received: from localhost by odin.nma.com id aa02707; 8 Apr 93 1:37 PDT
To: ietf-osi-x400ops@cs.wisc.edu
Subject: Re: Government of Canada X.400/SMTP Gateway
In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 07 Apr 1993 10:23:55 +0200. <9304070823.AA00916@survival.surfnet.nl>
Reply-To: Stef=x400@nma.com
Sender: ietf-archive-request@IETF.CNRI.Reston.VA.US
From: Einar Stefferud <Stef=x400@nma.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Apr 1993 01:37:25 -0700
Message-Id: <2705.734258245@odin.nma.com>
X-Orig-Sender: stef@nma.com

It would appear that our Candian friends are following the lead of
ATTMAIL which has yet another non-c0onformat-to-rfc1327 gateway, whcih
by the way, is quite different from the Canadian scheme.

I won`t mention what MCImail does with X.400 to Internet addresses;-)...\Stef