IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ospf-manet] Re: Ospf-manet Digest, Vol 11, Issue 7

Richard Ogier <rich.ogier@earthlink.net> Thu, 05 October 2006 01:05 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVHfl-0002Uq-7M; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:05:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVHfk-0002U0-6p for ospf-manet@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:05:12 -0400
Received: from pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.62]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GVHfh-0008Ru-Uv for ospf-manet@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:05:12 -0400
Received: from dialup-4.243.137.101.dial1.sanfrancisco1.level3.net ([4.243.137.101] helo=earthlink.net) by pop-altamira.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1GVHfe-0000aI-00; Wed, 04 Oct 2006 21:05:07 -0400
Message-ID: <45245A3E.2060002@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2006 18:05:02 -0700
From: Richard Ogier <rich.ogier@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 (emach0202)
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Aniket Desai <adesai@opnet.com>
Subject: Re: [Ospf-manet] Re: Ospf-manet Digest, Vol 11, Issue 7
References: <E1GUmiF-0007fT-K7@megatron.ietf.org> <6.2.3.4.2.20061003120748.036d1e38@mailserver.opnet.com> <452293EF.8000005@cisco.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20061003125842.036e78c8@mailserver.opnet.com> <4522A1A6.1010908@cisco.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20061003134740.036ed308@mailserver.opnet.com> <4522E87D.9000404@earthlink.net> <6.2.3.4.2.20061003185449.036a8d18@mailserver.opnet.com> <4522F64F.6050802@cisco.com> <6.2.3.4.2.20061003195545.036d0ee0@mailserver.opnet.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 79899194edc4f33a41f49410777972f8
Cc: ospf-manet@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf-manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of OSPFv3 extensions supporting MANET <ospf-manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet>, <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf-manet>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet>, <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-manet-bounces@ietf.org

Ironically, my slides for the MDR position draft presented
at the Dallas meeting did not even use the word "natural"!
Instead there was a slide titled "Similarities Between OSPF-MDR and OSPF"
http://www3.ietf.org/proceedings/06mar/slides/ospf-4/sld6.htm

I guess some unnecessary arguing could have been avoided if I
had referred to this slide instead the older one, so that
the relevant properties of OSPF-MDR could be discussed without
quibbling over the term "natural".

Anyway, these similarities between OSPF-MDR and OSPF are an
important aspect of the MDR approach.  (I know of several
people who agree with this.)  As mentioned, this similarity
is beneficial because it minimizes the number of objects,
concepts, techniques, etc. that must be added to OSPF.

Richard




_______________________________________________
Ospf-manet mailing list
Ospf-manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email