IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ospf-manet] MPR-OSPF GTNetS simulations report

Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Wed, 31 January 2007 09:48 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCC5I-00033U-Pt; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:48:56 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCC5H-00033H-Nv for ospf-manet@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:48:55 -0500
Received: from discorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.38]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HCC5D-00048C-AY for ospf-manet@ietf.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 04:48:55 -0500
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (ras75-3-82-226-221-97.fbx.proxad.net [82.226.221.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by discorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l0V9mR2d011901 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ospf-manet@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:48:28 +0100
Message-ID: <45C065EA.9040906@inria.fr>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 10:48:26 +0100
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (Macintosh/20061207)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ospf-manet@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ospf-manet] MPR-OSPF GTNetS simulations report
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at discorde with ID 45C065EB.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 7a6398bf8aaeabc7a7bb696b6b0a2aad
X-BeenThere: ospf-manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of OSPFv3 extensions supporting MANET <ospf-manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet>, <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf-manet>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet>, <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-manet-bounces@ietf.org

Hi Richard,

MPR-OSPF ensures that each advertized link is synchronized. This is why 
there is not a drastic improvement with the adjacency reduction option.

We agree that enough was exchanged about the subject: it is not possible 
to compare the different proposals with mere simulations. In particular, 
we must evaluate the functions that are provided by the different 
mechanisms, and not only raw overhead in a single scenario. Experience 
must be gathered with MPR, MDR and OR in order to really compare these 
approaches. So let's do that!

Emmanuel

_______________________________________________
Ospf-manet mailing list
Ospf-manet@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email