RE: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software
Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr> Mon, 18 December 2006 08:51 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwEDH-0000bs-Vg; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:51:11 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwEDF-0000Xo-VG for ospf-manet@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:51:09 -0500
Received: from concorde.inria.fr ([192.93.2.39]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GwEDE-0005wK-Ih for ospf-manet@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 03:51:09 -0500
Received: from [192.168.0.5] (ras75-3-82-226-221-97.fbx.proxad.net [82.226.221.97]) (authenticated bits=0) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id kBI8p289031982 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <ospf-manet@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:51:03 +0100
Message-ID: <45865670.7020806@inria.fr>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2006 09:50:56 +0100
From: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Macintosh/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ospf-manet@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 45865676.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)!
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: de4f315c9369b71d7dd5909b42224370
X-BeenThere: ospf-manet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions of OSPFv3 extensions supporting MANET <ospf-manet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet>, <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf-manet>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-manet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet>, <mailto:ospf-manet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-manet-bounces@ietf.org
Tom, We are saying that topology reduction is very effective. In fact, the load of the full LSAs is much larger than the load due to synchronization, as seen with all the simulations published so far. With the MPR topology reduction, up to 50% of the load due to LSAs can be avoided. It is difficult to match that with adjacency reduction on its own. However, adjacency reduction can indeed be complimentary, and this is also possible with MPR-OSPF, as described in the draft (instead of bringing up adjacencies with all its wireless neighbors a wireless router MAY bring up adjacencies with some of them), while still being OSPF compliant in the sense that routing is done over adjacencies only. Emmanuel _______________________________________________ Ospf-manet mailing list Ospf-manet@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-manet
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Emmanuel Baccelli
- [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Acee Lindem
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Richard Ogier
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Emmanuel Baccelli
- RE: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Henderson, Thomas R
- RE: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Emmanuel Baccelli
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Richard Ogier
- RE: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Emmanuel Baccelli
- RE: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Richard Ogier
- Re: [Ospf-manet] URL for MPR-extension software Richard Ogier