IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] Re: consensus

Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 04 November 2005 19:51 UTC

Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EY7ai-0007V8-N9; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:51:12 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EY7ah-0007V0-2R for ospf-wireless-design@megatron.ietf.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:51:11 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA09446 for <ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 14:50:47 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sj-iport-1-in.cisco.com ([171.71.176.70] helo=sj-iport-1.cisco.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EY7pj-0000Fg-1K for ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org; Fri, 04 Nov 2005 15:06:44 -0500
Received: from sj-core-1.cisco.com ([171.71.177.237]) by sj-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 04 Nov 2005 11:51:00 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,292,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="672029704:sNHT25263256"
Received: from xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com (xbh-sjc-221.cisco.com [128.107.191.63]) by sj-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA4JoMOH003908; Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:50:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com ([171.70.151.174]) by xbh-sjc-221.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:50:55 -0800
Received: from [10.21.90.69] ([10.21.90.69]) by xfe-sjc-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 4 Nov 2005 11:50:54 -0800
Message-ID: <436BBB9D.9010108@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 14:50:53 -0500
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Richard Ogier <rich.ogier@earthlink.net>
Subject: Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] Re: consensus
References: <436B37D9.3070709@inria.fr> <436BA9DC.6020902@earthlink.net>
In-Reply-To: <436BA9DC.6020902@earthlink.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Nov 2005 19:50:55.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[11783470:01C5E179]
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: d6b246023072368de71562c0ab503126
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Emmanuel Baccelli <Emmanuel.Baccelli@inria.fr>, ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: OSPF Wireless Design Team <ospf-wireless-design.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/ospf-wireless-design>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@lists.ietf.org

Richard Ogier wrote:

> Emmanuel,
>
> You seem to be missing some points in the recent discussion.
> Phil pointed out one of these in his email today.
> Another one you seem to be missing is that adjacencies
> based on MPRs (the way you select them) do not work, since they
> do not guarantee the graph of adjacencies is connected.
>
Hi Richard,
I don't understand why it wouldn't if an adjacency is formed (or retained)
if either neighbor selects the other as a relay? Of course, to do this 
effectively
the MPR selection algorithm should consider whether or not there is an
exant adjacency and give those relay candidate preference.

Thanks,
Acee

_______________________________________________
Ospf-wireless-design mailing list
Ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email