Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and Higher Mobility
Richard Ogier <rich.ogier@earthlink.net> Tue, 08 November 2005 16:39 UTC
Received: from localhost.cnri.reston.va.us ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EZWVl-00017a-UC; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:39:53 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1EZWVj-00016v-DZ for ospf-wireless-design@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:39:52 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA15914 for <ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 11:39:25 -0500 (EST)
Received: from pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([207.69.195.66]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZWlX-0000Ps-8N for ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:56:13 -0500
Received: from dialup-4.243.134.235.dial1.sanfrancisco1.level3.net ([4.243.134.235] helo=earthlink.net) by pop-canoe.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #10) id 1EZWVX-0000N7-00 for ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org; Tue, 08 Nov 2005 11:39:40 -0500
Message-ID: <4370D4C9.4050304@earthlink.net>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 08:39:37 -0800
From: Richard Ogier <rich.ogier@earthlink.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:0.9.4) Gecko/20011128 Netscape6/6.2.1 (emach0202)
X-Accept-Language: en-us
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ospf-wireless-design@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and Higher Mobility
References: <77F357662F8BFA4CA7074B0410171B6DC9E60E@XCH-NW-5V1.nw.nos.boeing.com> <436EB634.1000200@cisco.com> <436EBC7D.5030407@earthlink.net> <436FE92E.8020309@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 612a16ba5c5f570bfc42b3ac5606ac53
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: OSPF Wireless Design Team <ospf-wireless-design.lists.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/private/ospf-wireless-design>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design>, <mailto:ospf-wireless-design-request@lists.ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@lists.ietf.org
Errors-To: ospf-wireless-design-bounces@lists.ietf.org
All, I ran MDR with 1-connected adjacencies on the 50 node scenario that Cisco used with radio rage = 200 and velocity = 16. (Cisco used biconnected adjacencies for MDR, which was not a fair comparison.) The results are shown below for three choices of LSAFullness: 0 for Minimum LSAs, 2 for MDR Full LSAs, and 3 for Full LSAs. The resulting delivery ratios were .834, .839, and .849 for MDR, compared to .833 for MPRs in the same scenario, so delivery ratios are comparable. The resulting UDP forwards were 6265, 6255, and 5487 for MDR, compared to 10627 for MPRs, so much longer paths were obtained with MPRs. The resulting total overheads were 177.59, 257.33, and 500.61 (the last one is for Full LSAs) compared to 457.24 for MPRs. Although MDR with Full LSAs resulted in more overhead than MPRs, the other two choices of LSAs performed better than MPRs in all of the above metrics. The most notable result is the very long paths produced by MPRs, which is probably caused by a bug. The detailed results for MDR are given below. Another point is that Cisco considered very sparse networks (e.g., radio range = 100m), which frequently partition. Such networks necessarily have a very low delivery ratio (e.g., 38%) due to partitions, so I am not sure how important such scenarios are to us. Richard ------------------------------------------------- Results for AdjConn = 1 and LSAFullness = 0: ./random_waypoint_manet-opt wireless_interface=2 wireless_flooding=2 diff_hellos persistent_mdr HelloInterval=2 RxmtInterval=5 DeadInterval=6 BackupWaitInterval=2000 AckInterval=1800 MinLSInterval=5 velocity=16 RouterDeadCount=3 TwoHopRefresh=6 AdjConnectivity=1 LSAFullness=0 num_nodes=50 start_time=1800 stop_time=2700 radio_range=200 Neighbor statistics (at physical layer): -------------------------------------------------- Number of nodes: 50 Neighbor threshold distance (m): 200.00 Average neighbor density (neighbors/# of nodes): 0.45 Average neighbor changes/time (changes/sec/node): 0.40 OSPFv3 Statistics | Packets Bytes Kbps ---------------------------------------------------- Hello | 22500 2413204 21.45 LSAck | 20640 3205360 28.49 LSR | 913 50520 0.45 DBDESC | 12385 8838596 78.57 LSU | 29246 5471504 48.64 LSUfld | 20401 3782740 33.62 LSUuni | 8845 1688764 15.01 LSUcol | 122 41344 0.37 LSUrxmt | 7361 1401920 12.46 LSUdbex | 876 156828 1.39 LSUstale| 486 88672 0.79 | Total | 85684 19979184 177.59 OSPF Network Characteristics -------------------------------------------------- OSPF 2way_neighbors/node: 21.43 OSPF 2way_neighbor_changes/node/sec: 0.72 avg_sec/OSPF 2way neighbor_life: 62.39 OSPF adjacencies/node: 2.80 OSPF adjacency_changes/node/sec: 0.11 avg_LSAsOutSync: 0.21 Flooding Statistics -------------------------------------------------- relaysel/node: 4.13 avg_sec/relaysel_life: 22.15 suppressed_LSAs: 115555 relay_flood_LSAs: 26708 nonrelay_flood_LSAs: 1489 User Traffic Analysis -------------------------------------------------- UDP sends: 8927 pkts, 607036 bytes UDP receives: 7446 pkts, 506328 bytes UDP forwards: 6265 pkts, 426020 bytes Delivery Ratio: 0.834 ---------------------- ---------------------- Results for AdjConn = 1 and LSAFullness = 2: ./random_waypoint_manet-opt wireless_interface=2 wireless_flooding=2 diff_hellos persistent_mdr HelloInterval=2 RxmtInterval=5 DeadInterval=6 BackupWaitInterval=2000 AckInterval=1800 MinLSInterval=5 velocity=16 RouterDeadCount=3 TwoHopRefresh=6 AdjConnectivity=1 LSAFullness=2 num_nodes=50 start_time=1800 stop_time=2700 radio_range=200 Neighbor statistics (at physical layer): -------------------------------------------------- Number of nodes: 50 Neighbor threshold distance (m): 200.00 Average neighbor density (neighbors/# of nodes): 0.45 Average neighbor changes/time (changes/sec/node): 0.40 OSPFv3 Statistics | Packets Bytes Kbps ---------------------------------------------------- Hello | 22500 2413904 21.46 LSAck | 21322 4053592 36.03 LSR | 1021 59340 0.53 DBDESC | 12285 8778188 78.03 LSU | 35642 13644084 121.28 LSUfld | 26785 10614172 94.35 LSUuni | 8857 3029912 26.93 LSUcol | 169 107900 0.96 LSUrxmt | 6861 2250452 20.00 LSUdbex | 1024 383024 3.40 LSUstale| 803 288536 2.56 | Total | 92770 28949108 257.33 OSPF Network Characteristics -------------------------------------------------- OSPF 2way_neighbors/node: 21.41 OSPF 2way_neighbor_changes/node/sec: 0.72 avg_sec/OSPF 2way neighbor_life: 61.95 OSPF adjacencies/node: 2.83 OSPF adjacency_changes/node/sec: 0.11 avg_LSAsOutSync: 0.28 Flooding Statistics -------------------------------------------------- relaysel/node: 4.17 avg_sec/relaysel_life: 21.73 suppressed_LSAs: 157782 relay_flood_LSAs: 36598 nonrelay_flood_LSAs: 1973 User Traffic Analysis -------------------------------------------------- UDP sends: 8927 pkts, 607036 bytes UDP receives: 7489 pkts, 509252 bytes UDP forwards: 6255 pkts, 425340 bytes Delivery Ratio: 0.839 ---------------------- ---------------------- Results for AdjConn = 1 and LSAFullness = 3: ./random_waypoint_manet-opt wireless_interface=2 wireless_flooding=2 diff_hellos persistent_mdr HelloInterval=2 RxmtInterval=5 DeadInterval=6 BackupWaitInterval=2000 AckInterval=1800 MinLSInterval=5 velocity=16 RouterDeadCount=3 TwoHopRefresh=6 AdjConnectivity=1 LSAFullness=3 num_nodes=50 start_time=1800 stop_time=2700 radio_range=200 Neighbor statistics (at physical layer): -------------------------------------------------- Number of nodes: 50 Neighbor threshold distance (m): 200.00 Average neighbor density (neighbors/# of nodes): 0.45 Average neighbor changes/time (changes/sec/node): 0.40 OSPFv3 Statistics | Packets Bytes Kbps ---------------------------------------------------- Hello | 22500 2416260 21.48 LSAck | 23129 7721964 68.64 LSR | 1226 80736 0.72 DBDESC | 12324 8813560 78.34 LSU | 57816 37286656 331.44 LSUfld | 47926 31242564 277.71 LSUuni | 9890 6044092 53.73 LSUcol | 312 307032 2.73 LSUrxmt | 6646 3961992 35.22 LSUdbex | 1458 1045684 9.29 LSUstale| 1474 729384 6.48 | Total | 116995 56319176 500.61 OSPF Network Characteristics -------------------------------------------------- OSPF 2way_neighbors/node: 21.39 OSPF 2way_neighbor_changes/node/sec: 0.73 avg_sec/OSPF 2way neighbor_life: 61.35 OSPF adjacencies/node: 2.83 OSPF adjacency_changes/node/sec: 0.11 avg_LSAsOutSync: 0.47 Flooding Statistics -------------------------------------------------- relaysel/node: 4.12 avg_sec/relaysel_life: 22.41 suppressed_LSAs: 339546 relay_flood_LSAs: 78496 nonrelay_flood_LSAs: 4173 User Traffic Analysis -------------------------------------------------- UDP sends: 8927 pkts, 607036 bytes UDP receives: 7580 pkts, 515440 bytes UDP forwards: 5487 pkts, 373116 bytes Delivery Ratio: 0.849 _______________________________________________ Ospf-wireless-design mailing list Ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design
- [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and Higher M… Acee Lindem
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Richard Ogier
- RE: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Spagnolo, Phillip A
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Acee Lindem
- RE: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Alvaro Retana
- RE: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Acee Lindem
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Acee Lindem
- RE: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Henderson, Thomas R
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Acee Lindem
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Richard Ogier
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Acee Lindem
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Richard Ogier
- Re: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and High… Richard Ogier
- [Ospf-wireless-design] Smart Peering draft update Abhay Roy