RE: [Ospf-wireless-design] OSPF Flooding and Higher Mobility

Acee, first, thanks for providing this information and (eventually) the
code. 

> 
> MPRs have the following improvements over the base provided 
> with GTNetS:
> 
>      - Smart Peering is fixed to avoid instability by running a second
>        SPF to determine if a potential peer is available via a real
>        adjacency or unsynchronized adjacency. The adjacency 
> is only suppressed
>        in the case of connectivity to the SPT via real 
> adjacencies. This
>        is discussed in the Boeing report but wasn't implemented.
> 

One potential problem that I foresee with this method is that, as
connectivity conditions change in the network, one has to go back and
re-evaluate whether previous decisions to suppress the formation of
adjacencies are still valid.  Are you addressing this issue somehow, and
if so, how?

Tom

_______________________________________________
Ospf-wireless-design mailing list
Ospf-wireless-design@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf-wireless-design