Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

[Hannes Gredler <[e-mail]>]

hi dhruv,

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:39:58PM +0530, Dhruv Dhody wrote:
| Hi Shraddha,
| 
| Thanks for your reply, snipping to the open point...
| 
| > Also, it should be stated
| > - if are more than one instance of this TLV in RI LSA are allowed.
| >
| > <Shraddha>More than one instance of the TLV can be added in same RI-LSA or in a multiple instance as defined
| >                        In  draft-acee-ospf-rfc4970bis-00.txt
| >
| Okay, text may be added to reflect this.
| 
| > (2) It should be explicitly stated that - No IANA registry is required to store the meaning or interpretation of.the tag values.
| >
| > <Shraddha> It's mentioned in the section 4.2 that no well known  tag values will be defined by this document.
| >
| Since in the mailing list there is a discussion about possibility of
| having well known tag value assigned by IANA. This document should
| clarify (based on WG consensus) if admin tags can be assigned by IANA
| in future documents or not. And if the answer is yes, a suitable range
| should be set to avoid conflict.

i have no concerns with that -
however peter seems in favor of using CAP Bits for well-known applications;

would be interesting to hear others' opinion on that.

/hannes