Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com> Mon, 18 September 2017 20:24 UTC
Return-Path: <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC17B13302A;
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id cno6xqYG84E7; Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x242.google.com (mail-yw0-x242.google.com
[IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::242])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B002A132D42;
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x242.google.com with SMTP id t127so773937ywg.5;
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:24:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025;
h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to
:references; bh=7uuRPJRE6i0N4r7AvvokHbM5MMokj4MrTo6yfl15/fI=;
b=APCCSmOl2Xp4u1T2dTh3Or9Euww2ud1BLerBciHO7XYQmB9C3F0QpofxLDSb5sz3K/
fXjetY+pRpUUnFDNpC/wbGKtEumItQyscXfwDuj3fYdZK9zzkYSwre+rtOU02fV7F+Pg
lgHso9O2PoW7T/mU+9FG/04X0yBOop+bRiGs1SwOejeZxilsginQwHeYyzHEHfwWLEMi
unPf/zunBoc/cG+FgfMErf1m/YVUPq8QvyUsFpaOkGDF0jKewWfqsxIzTVuuqDANE6g5
oYMaia3inHrGPxuu4BfzxSXgWsU0I8lLNYzfQhyhDIVCyUSAz6O7bzgY9mCEXTkvGyBE
gdKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=1e100.net; s=20161025;
h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date
:in-reply-to:cc:to:references;
bh=7uuRPJRE6i0N4r7AvvokHbM5MMokj4MrTo6yfl15/fI=;
b=h/Lh0i2H/nWYacAhV3t4sgJXymcJBsv8OCsJBkV8ik45IHV1R+dnyw5hGSOylyX+rJ
OHl/fLqjbyKDmMvxURgndyq12/fuWmtkHyC0ADN81yR4Cbs0383TCWYCdUYMhdHElZ2R
1zQAsrPKAwpPx9iF21S1IG9A/9/9rOopbU/18zh189WYKqBOAF2iO2Va/E095l0aGfFJ
zRTpecPiKhpMwI2nICR3I0k+JSIhDlYeZzjc2sPPrni6lL/VDyy2TLeC1dL0LFTCoDYi
f4XPSRbdiqFiWF6jiEBqX8AkoLKU0l9ILelPvnR8+y1t6xv+Xx5epdajC9lhlAX/nn2s
r5dQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUgRDeAjsfF2W+PTpcvK2Lptd0b5SW+8u9Hwb2oNq3W6xXfeihFv
Mi/cUHe7UOeqSNcx4uY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb7waFVq9NaUC9Bu2Ci7kOg1xNcijKDKIHhZSIqBFOH+OD7oj6r5KXf9pNMC2ROPS5e1zm1N4w==
X-Received: by 10.37.49.213 with SMTP id x204mr27536609ybx.40.1505766283910;
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.0.0.12] (45-19-110-76.lightspeed.tukrga.sbcglobal.net.
[45.19.110.76])
by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w137sm3333615ywd.9.2017.09.18.13.24.42
(version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
Mon, 18 Sep 2017 13:24:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <1405DEF4-1AAC-459D-874B-5EB4B93AE94C@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_CF74EF73-7600-4424-A55E-076A5B24BFAC"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 16:24:42 -0400
In-Reply-To: <10459_1505748011_59BFE42B_10459_96_12_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47879377@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap@ietf.org>,
Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>,
"ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>,
"ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
To: bruno.decraene@orange.com
References: <150414779958.16833.5322499494351720362.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
<10459_1505748011_59BFE42B_10459_96_12_53C29892C857584299CBF5D05346208A47879377@OPEXCLILM21.corporate.adroot.infra.ftgroup>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/07__O4wA-vnOQwVE4CZqgWs9ffo>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on
draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>,
<mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>,
<mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 20:24:47 -0000
Hi Bruno, Thanks for the changes. > On Sep 18, 2017, at 11:20 AM, <bruno.decraene@orange.com> <bruno.decraene@orange.com> wrote: > > Suresh, > > Thanks for the review and comments. > Please see inline [Bruno] > >> From: Suresh Krishnan [mailto:suresh.krishnan@gmail.com] >> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:50 AM >> >> Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for >> draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-06: Discuss >> >> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all >> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this >> introductory paragraph, however.) >> >> >> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html >> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. >> >> >> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap/ >> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> DISCUSS: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> * There seems to be an difference between this document's definition of >> sub-TLVs (with 2 octet types and lengths) and those of RFC5512 (with 1 octet >> types and lengths). So I am surprised to see the document point to the RFC5512 >> based TLVs for both syntax and semantics (Sections 5.1, 5.2, 5.3 ...) . Can you >> please explain how these sub-TLVs are encoded on the wire to be compatible with >> this draft? > > [Bruno] Would the following change works for you? > > OLD: > This Sub-TLV of type 2 is defined in Section 3.4.1 "Protocol Type > sub-TLV" of <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps"/> from a > syntactic, semantic, and usage standpoint. > > NEW: > This Sub-TLV type is 2. The syntax, semantic, and usage of its value field is defined in Section 3.4.1 "Protocol Type > sub-TLV" of <xref target="I-D.ietf-idr-tunnel-encaps"/>. Excellent. That would address my concerns. I checked the new version of the draft and this fix addresses all of the instances of this issue. I will clear. > > > >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> COMMENT: >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> * IANA considerations >> >> Looks like the value 65535 is included both as experimental and reserved. Suggest changing >> >> OLD: >> 65500-65535 Experimental This document >> >> NEW: >> 65500-65534 Experimental This document >> > > [Bruno] Good catch. Thanks for the careful review. Fixed as per you suggestion in -07 https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-07.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-07.txt> Great. Regards Suresh
- [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-os… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-iet… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-iet… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-iet… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-iet… bruno.decraene
- Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-iet… Suresh Krishnan
- Re: [OSPF] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-iet… Suresh Krishnan