Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management - draft-bhatia-karp-ospf-ip-layer-protection-03

Russ White <russ@cisco.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 18:45 UTC

Return-Path: <russ@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70C2E0887 for <ospf@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:45:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TtMy8F5D7sRg for <ospf@ietfc.amsl.com>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-2.cisco.com (sj-iport-2.cisco.com [171.71.176.71]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CB79E088C for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=russ@cisco.com; l=1170; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1302633920; x=1303843520; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject: references:in-reply-to; bh=YYcIU8lDNuDPu0xrrdtMXMTf92XGhrvEwxtdeLwQHKM=; b=W6OlvmmYgSokQCd8f+92oT1266RGSKyefNTkjA9zF7u9uBlb/HU7K4ul cCvi/mp1RMUnpLQzC9dDQSvlo0qd0k07Pp7BD50V6w94V6uZsBVoJZInI IAqGmu+K+TwbjZeTqUlk+Gw2OTJoW4g3sk1aFwBFHKS0gkER3LXVDK6w6 o=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 259
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAGKdpE2tJXG8/2dsb2JhbACmAHemC50EhW4EjWKDbg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.64,198,1301875200"; d="asc'?scan'208"; a="335664062"
Received: from rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com ([173.37.113.188]) by sj-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Apr 2011 18:43:13 +0000
Received: from [10.116.137.181] (rtp-russwh-8714.cisco.com [10.116.137.181]) by rcdn-core2-1.cisco.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id p3CIhCmj000953; Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:43:12 GMT
Message-ID: <4DA49D38.8020206@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 14:43:04 -0400
From: Russ White <russ@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
References: <4B460FD5-4E9D-4ECF-8D7B-24137FBF9017@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <4B460FD5-4E9D-4ECF-8D7B-24137FBF9017@ericsson.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig340EE36A2E8780BCFE04818E"
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Security Extension for OSPFv2 when using Manual Key Management - draft-bhatia-karp-ospf-ip-layer-protection-03
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 18:45:22 -0000

Support.

:-)

Russ

On 4/11/2011 1:18 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
> There was general agreement that this should be a WG document at the meeting in Prague. Please indicate your position on making this draft a WG document with intended status Proposed Standard. 
> 
> Thanks,
> Acee
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf