Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-00.txt
Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com> Thu, 16 October 2014 09:36 UTC
Return-Path: <asmirnov@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37A51A19FE for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:36:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PE8wIZKROWEa for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0F2F1A19E6 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Oct 2014 02:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2076; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1413452177; x=1414661777; h=message-id:date:from:mime-version:to:subject:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3/gTbtYsRZ78qCPRRVAvq0vHkbkgOA39jRTrzxH/crw=; b=b2h1rbGQfdToJg306N5N4uTkTCYmP2KV3O4r4ifNENXlypNsu105L1rs 0hexV5V4Qd3bYy+UYpExcWpdYHc5fofsTH9AiNaZGxrTh15I5TEMXSwpG v4BWWF2y37FrXwaCrcHnXwvK1kU1xkQu4rXBTHYnt8/6LLOUTNsECU2zs k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AqoEAJyQP1StJssW/2dsb2JhbABbg2FYzA0Mh0sCgScBfYQCAQEBBAEBATU2CQENBAsRBAEBAQkWCAcJAwIBAgEVHwgBCAYBDAYCAQEFiDUNyXQBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXkFUGhEUBBJZDhxKBMDyDCpElgjSBRTsvAYJJAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.04,731,1406592000"; d="scan'208";a="212721503"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2014 09:36:14 +0000
Received: from as-lnx.cisco.com (ams-asmirnov-8714.cisco.com [10.55.140.85]) (authenticated bits=0) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s9G9aBQ8009071 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:36:12 GMT
Message-ID: <543F918B.7080502@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 11:36:11 +0200
From: Anton Smirnov <asmirnov@cisco.com>
Organization: Cisco Systems
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.1.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Uma Chunduri <uma.chunduri@ericsson.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
References: <20141015223207.13284.58611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F3C9B9D@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <1B502206DFA0C544B7A60469152008633F3C9B9D@eusaamb105.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Authenticated-User: asmirnov
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/0kbxGq6t3VRDcPvSsNuBM1o6rwM
Subject: Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 09:36:18 -0000
Hi Uma,
there is very important difference with admin tags.
Admin tags have known formatting. Because of this it is possible to
advertise a tag from implementation even if it doesn't support
functionality which local network policy designates to the tag.
Self-defined TLV does not have fixed formatting known beforehand. So
only the implementation which is aware of its internals can originate
and interpret it. For this reason it is more like Experimental or
Vendor-Specific Sub-TLV.
Anton
On 10/16/2014 01:30 AM, Uma Chunduri wrote:
> Dear OSPF WG,
>
> Please see the link for the document below.
>
> Abstract:
> This document proposes a TLV within the body of the OSPF Router
> Information (RI) Opaque LSA, called Self-defined Sub-TLV Container
> TLV. Here the term OSPF means both OSPFv2 and OSPFv3.
>
> Comments/Concerns/Suggestions welcome!
>
> --
> Uma C.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org [mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 3:32 PM
> To: Uma Chunduri; Luis M. Contreras; Xiaohu Xu; Luis M.Contreras; Xiaohu Xu; Uma Chunduri
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-00.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-00.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Uma Chunduri and posted to the IETF repository.
>
> Name: draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs
> Revision: 00
> Title: Using Self-defined Sub-TLVs for Agile Service Deployment
> Document date: 2014-10-15
> Group: Individual Submission
> Pages: 7
> URL: http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-00.txt
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs/
> Htmlized: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-chunduri-ospf-self-defined-sub-tlvs-00
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
- [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft-chu… Uma Chunduri
- Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Anton Smirnov
- Re: [OSPF] FW: New Version Notification for draft… Uma Chunduri