Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag

Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net> Mon, 25 August 2014 22:29 UTC

Return-Path: <hannes@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A571A03CA for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OIa9oXzZJ1-2 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1blp0183.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.183]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB2E61A03AC for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 15:29:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hannes-mba.local (66.129.239.14) by DM2PR05MB447.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.104.150) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1015.19; Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:29:20 +0000
Received: from juniper.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by hannes-mba.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 187562557AB; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:29:09 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 00:29:08 +0200
From: Hannes Gredler <hannes@juniper.net>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <20140825222908.GA3172@juniper.net>
References: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <D0212051.2116%acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-Originating-IP: [66.129.239.14]
X-ClientProxiedBy: CO2PR06CA020.namprd06.prod.outlook.com (10.141.242.20) To DM2PR05MB447.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.104.150)
X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;UriScan:;
X-Forefront-PRVS: 03142412E2
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(164054003)(24454002)(189002)(199003)(74662001)(74502001)(47776003)(99396002)(4396001)(20776003)(66066001)(86362001)(76482001)(87976001)(64706001)(36756003)(15975445006)(97756001)(92566001)(19580395003)(23726002)(83322001)(19580405001)(81542001)(50986999)(76176999)(81342001)(50466002)(83506001)(21056001)(83072002)(80022001)(92726001)(76506005)(101416001)(33656002)(85306004)(77096002)(95666004)(46406003)(77982001)(54356999)(106356001)(102836001)(79102001)(105586002)(31966008)(90102001)(46102001)(230783001)(107046002)(85852003)(110136001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR05MB447; H:hannes-mba.local; FPR:; MLV:sfv; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/1egrA2Caag2YfDK2kXP5aVOWiXU
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-hegde-ospf-node-admin-tag
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2014 22:29:25 -0000

support (as an author :-)) - 

note that in the latest version we have added also added a use-case
example for building auto-LSP-meshes  ...

/hannes

On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 09:18:09PM +0000, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
|    There are situations where node level policy is required and an OSPF
|    advertised admin tag simplifies this. For example, advertisement of
|    remote-LFA eligibility.
|    Please indicate your support or objections to adopting this draft as an
|    OSPF WG document.
|    Thanks,
|    Acee

| _______________________________________________
| OSPF mailing list
| OSPF@ietf.org
| https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf