RE: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs?
"GOODSPEED Don" <Don.Goodspeed@alcatel.com> Mon, 13 November 2006 17:27 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjfaQ-00081c-Uk; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:27:10 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjfaQ-00081O-2N for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:27:10 -0500
Received: from [143.209.238.161] (helo=audl951.usa.alcatel.com) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjfaO-0001qR-O1 for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 12:27:10 -0500
Received: from usdalsbhs01.ad3.ad.alcatel.com (usdalsbhs01.usa.alcatel.com [172.22.216.19]) by audl951.usa.alcatel.com (ALCANET) with ESMTP id kADHR8JJ013720; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:08 -0600
Received: from USDALSMBS03.ad3.ad.alcatel.com ([172.22.216.8]) by usdalsbhs01.ad3.ad.alcatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.2499); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:07 -0600
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs?
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 11:27:04 -0600
Message-ID: <67FBA6A55FF15B46B8B572062529D26A10ACB3@USDALSMBS03.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <1163413071.4558464f282ce@panthermail.uwm.edu>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs?
Thread-Index: AccHDfLb1UZzQPmQQEO95f3JZo229QAOofWw
From: GOODSPEED Don <Don.Goodspeed@alcatel.com>
To: mukul@uwm.edu, ospf@ietf.org
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2006 17:27:07.0954 (UTC) FILETIME=[F1D33920:01C70748]
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 143.209.238.34
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 69a74e02bbee44ab4f8eafdbcedd94a1
Cc:
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
Mukul, The ordering and such of how routes are installed in a FIB (any forwarding table) is extremely vendor-specific (and vendor-unique). As this is a vendor-agnostic forum, you probably won't be receiving any responses (at least not public ones). Cheers, Don -----Original Message----- From: mukul@uwm.edu [mailto:mukul@uwm.edu] Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:18 AM To: ospf@ietf.org Subject: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs? Hi all, I apologize for this out-of-scope question. I know Cisco's IS-IS implementation supports priority-driven processing of advertised IP prefixes. http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_ guide09186a00801b2285.html I was wondering if some OSPF implementations support similar priority-driven processing of ASE LSAs? Thanks, Mukul Goyal _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf