Re: [OSPF] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14

"Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> Thu, 18 May 2017 01:34 UTC

Return-Path: <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7F9129461; Wed, 17 May 2017 18:34:31 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YqLnq8j1cTD1; Wed, 17 May 2017 18:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 977B9129455; Wed, 17 May 2017 18:34:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id DNG38751; Thu, 18 May 2017 01:34:26 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from DGGEML405-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.3.17.49) by lhreml706-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.47) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.301.0; Thu, 18 May 2017 02:34:25 +0100
Received: from DGGEML509-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.14]) by dggeml405-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.3.17.49]) with mapi id 14.03.0301.000; Thu, 18 May 2017 09:34:20 +0800
From: "Yemin (Amy)" <amy.yemin@huawei.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, "rtg-dir@ietf.org" <rtg-dir@ietf.org>
CC: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14
Thread-Index: AQHSzwYeJ6QO1mB4GE+TPaqcTtLKAaH5Ty+A
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 01:34:20 +0000
Message-ID: <9C5FD3EFA72E1740A3D41BADDE0B461FC6BA7F39@dggeml509-mbx.china.huawei.com>
References: <149501293882.6715.9441857001639471954@ietfa.amsl.com> <D541B500.AF34E%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D541B500.AF34E%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.169.31.176]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A020205.591CFA23.0007, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=169.254.1.14, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: d43c34b6ff31f284a66ccc5f19666669
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/2KMOAvhA2jPxoP_H57DcxguCamM>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 01:34:32 -0000

Hi Acee, 

Thanks for correction. I updated the result as "Ready". 

BR,
Amy

-----Original Message-----
From: Acee Lindem (acee) [mailto:acee@cisco.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 8:07 PM
To: Yemin (Amy) <amy.yemin@huawei.com>om>; rtg-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ospf@ietf.org; ietf@ietf.org; draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14

Hi Min ,

On 5/17/17, 5:22 AM, "Min Ye" <amy.yemin@huawei.com> wrote:

>Reviewer: IJsbrand Wijnands
>Review result: Has Issues

I think the result is “No Issues”.

Thanks,
Acee
>
>Hi All,
>
>I have been selected to do a routing directorate QA review of this 
>draft.
>https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend-14.txt
>
>Summary: 
>
>This draft proposes a new addressing (TLV) format to more easily allow
>
>additional information to be added as part of a particular LSA.
>Overall, well written, easy to understand what the objective is for 
>this draft.
>
>Comments and Questions:
>
>This looks like a pretty radical change to the OSPFv3 spec. I would 
>almost argue to call it OSPFv4..
>
>Its very unfortunate there are no ‘reserved’ fields in RFC5340 that 
>would allow you keep the existing LSA’s format and have some way to 
>extend it differently. The TLV approach look good, I can’t see a better 
>way to achieve the goal.
>
>Minor Issues and Nits:
>none.
>
>Thx,
>
>Ice.
>
>