IETF Logo Mail Archive

[OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 23 July 2015 12:24 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 266AA1A92E4 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fdSH9enxsQWT for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 251321A0191 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 05:24:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=452; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1437654297; x=1438863897; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=JQ8sYYfRgwbD+6OEhw38VeH3eHlbXtXuJ9y8cb1AS6o=; b=mZDN19nzv6K4+s12/hX0xOpX4qRIaEIXSthS7PenT456pRJLrCZDxdaK GRbk5/8clqL99zfSn9+iylkMUl9Ujb1i/gYmWtU4dL7Uh6JzFEQAuJUVB bXda2MV6z+YPEm9RW0/jIUjQBRjdG8C7KRxg2E4kxRSd/cGq/yIJQgDFR s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AoAwC73LBV/5tdJa1cgxWBQ4MduDsJiBSBKzgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhCodBhFXASICHwcCBDAVEgSIQaU9j1+WIAEBAQcBAQEBHoEikiCBQwWUYAGMOYFEhB2PWYNhJmOBW4E+gjaBBAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.15,530,1432598400"; d="scan'208";a="171493561"
Received: from rcdn-core-4.cisco.com ([173.37.93.155]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 23 Jul 2015 12:24:37 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com [173.37.183.88]) by rcdn-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t6NCOb2j005983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:24:37 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.37]) by xhc-rcd-x14.cisco.com ([173.37.183.88]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 23 Jul 2015 07:24:37 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Working Group Last Call for "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02
Thread-Index: AQHQxUKK73XZHdTVJEKOLIHTGz/LTQ==
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:24:36 +0000
Message-ID: <D1D6A9A7.295FB%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.241.178]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <28817237B94A5245ACAC7EC3E07BF3EB@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/2YHpu5yh1eqvyD8YotRvODZMsSg>
Subject: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for "Advertising per-node administrative tags in OSPF" - draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-02
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2015 12:24:58 -0000

This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, August 22th, 2015. Note that
we are doing a 4 week WG last call due to the volume of IETF WG last calls
made this week and the fact that many WG participants may be taking
vacation in August.

Thanks,
Acee

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email