IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3?

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 30 July 2014 23:39 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688891A05C0 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:39:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.502
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.502 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TdQZ3NMrJV1p for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9675C1A0451 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 16:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1295; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1406763548; x=1407973148; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=wLaczMbA52hJA7ry8R5X45uoEWGTA6Kr9OU+JY6dIVo=; b=OBH4AzrYBlsbUjsStiax8bRZvH7rcUn4joEh9bYfSf2e4Zt6BLAwPr8D EKW393ZGZCVq67gWRG0743fGRZkZjbirpzrwZvYsrBH1mDKX1/mE5m2Dj Y8lXRZu7GpDLv9tr/CS5kpHd9aXoTIJWnT7sGqeUaMwK3R+Y6GIqlh9kR Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicFAG2B2VOtJV2R/2dsb2JhbABZgw5SVwTKZR8KiFgWd4QEAQEBAwEBAWsdAQhtCycEARKIQg3APxMElB0FikWRH5RTg0lsgUU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.01,768,1400025600"; d="scan'208";a="344023468"
Received: from rcdn-core-9.cisco.com ([173.37.93.145]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2014 23:39:07 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s6UNd5dI022016 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:39:05 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.69]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Wed, 30 Jul 2014 18:39:05 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3?
Thread-Index: AQHPrE9z6AFuPERZukKyfPqG23hyBQ==
Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:39:05 +0000
Message-ID: <CFFEF972.15D3%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.195]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <C503666019843949873AC1F554C96BD4@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/2enctG5vTiLpsgNl43s6MzkagdY
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG adoption---draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3?
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Jul 2014 23:39:08 -0000

Hi Helen,
As an author, I would certainly support this work. I think it is clearly
in the OSPF WG¹s best interest to facilitate migration to a single
version. When that happens will be dependent on numerous factors including
requirements, deployments, and how well we facilitate it.
Thanks,
Acee

On 7/22/14, 8:53 PM, "Ing-Wher Chen" <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com> wrote:

>Hello,
>
>I'd like to ask if the working group would adopt and help improve and
>refine
>the following draft:
>
><https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-chen-ospf-transition-to-ospfv3/>
>
>This document describes a mechanism to transport OSPfv3 over IPv4.
>The mechanism allows devices to migrate to OSPFv3 first, which would help
>with transition to IPv6 later.
>
>The latest -01 version addresses an earlier question by including
>an IPv4-only use case in which deployed devices cannot communicate
>in IPv6 but would benefit from using the mechanism proposed in this draft
>to transition to OSPFv3 for now.  Until all devices can communicate using
>IPv6,
>consolidating to OSPFv3 can still reduce operational complexity and cost.
>
>Thanks,
>Helen
> 
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>OSPF@ietf.org
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email