Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

"Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com> Fri, 05 February 2016 14:15 UTC

Return-Path: <cpignata@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C7E1B393A; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:15:38 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ghk3WzMk_j6a; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:15:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com [173.37.86.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BEA21B3937; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 06:15:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=17466; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454681735; x=1455891335; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=cphmFTOA0R6AqCGKw4H4mLqZ0uMeV7rk2Pqnn4TcOLM=; b=YTJpqYy78b05UB8syaJaCrwfpJshSq2efRR8iO+PFs1WML3YanxvoM7m QwThIs5GzcM1QDSbdVooJOeMtbEIMtFsbDTPs1qaI5HAApyG0LPs1mMV9 a05PaS+jc4PVpnUzfQCnHhn1Qh9UKhLnmJuES9RRJikr97oPttQMvqBs8 w=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 841
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DnAgA0rrRW/4kNJK1egm5MUl4PBohVr?= =?us-ascii?q?nqCEw6BZiOFagKBMDgUAQEBAQEBAYEKhEEBAQEDASNWBQsCAQgRAwECAScDAgI?= =?us-ascii?q?hERQJCAIEDgUOh3gDCggOsH2KFA2ERwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQ0EB?= =?us-ascii?q?IYSgW2CSoI3ghsNglMrgQ8Fkm6EBwGCfYFkaoYRgXMHgVSNGIVugQ+Db4NRAR4?= =?us-ascii?q?BQ4IDGYFIagGIf3wBAQE?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,400,1449532800"; d="asc'?scan'208,217";a="68334832"
Received: from alln-core-4.cisco.com ([173.36.13.137]) by rcdn-iport-9.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 05 Feb 2016 14:15:34 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (xch-rtp-005.cisco.com [64.101.220.145]) by alln-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u15EFXCh015853 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:15:34 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) by XCH-RTP-005.cisco.com (64.101.220.145) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:15:33 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com ([64.101.220.160]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:15:33 -0500
From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
Thread-Index: AQHRX4CVRGRf7e6ISkyrMJZ6tz0da58cmAUAgAAGoYCAAHcEAIAACy0AgACeOQCAABUagA==
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2016 14:15:33 +0000
Message-ID: <EF2E19CF-DAEF-4E13-BE5F-55A1EA986D3D@cisco.com>
References: <D252E730.385E8%acee@cisco.com> <CAG1kdojiU6fzn7XYSSdpfabxMDUQYvbgNNRCjZbraJKq2+WwJQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2668656.3CED2%acee@cisco.com> <c3caff28c3d243b99e523be8bc64719f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2669DC6.3CF08%acee@cisco.com> <8ef4f51407804a91950ab126277368a6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com> <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com> <D2D90F1A.4B992%acee@cisco.com> <D055B8DB-8D78-4CEC-8E7F-90E9BD6E0A47@cisco.com> <CAG1kdohexHAJBRas53K7YB+U3yE_Nhy5FGd-n4vmr47dNMbU6A@mail.gmail.com> <D35900BF-2CD6-4FFB-B403-49C1210B7547@cisco.com> <D2DA067F.4BADD%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D2DA067F.4BADD%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.150.54.100]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_759A4DB3-D446-493D-A427-F8635E6A45B3"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/2k-vYUeYeal0VOnD57JC0ts2wlo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 14:15:38 -0000

Thanks Acee. You were right. Text added now and rev++ posted.

Thanks,

— Carlos.

> On Feb 5, 2016, at 8:00 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:
> 
> Carlos, Manav,
>  I remember now as well - this is the text I was referring to after the discussion including Les.
> Thanks,
> Acee
> 
> From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com <mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>>
> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 10:33 PM
> To: Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com <mailto:manavbhatia@gmail.com>>
> Cc: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com <mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
> Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
> 
> Thank you Manav! I remember now :-)
> 
> Done :-)
> 
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03 <https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-03>
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> — Carlos.
> 
>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 9:53 PM, Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com <mailto:manavbhatia@gmail.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Carlos,
>> 
>> I think we need to add the following in the current version:
>> 
>> “When multiple S-BFD discriminators are advertised how a given discriminator is mapped to a specific use case is out of scope for this document.”
>> 
>> I dont have the xml with me that i can update. Can you do it if you have one with you?
>> 
>> Cheers, Manav
>> 
>> On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 1:17 AM, Carlos Pignataro (cpignata) <cpignata@cisco.com <mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>> wrote:
>> Hi, Acee,
>> 
>>> On Feb 4, 2016, at 2:24 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>> 
>>> From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com <mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>>
>>> Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM
>>> To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
>>> Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com <mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>, Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com <mailto:manavbhatia@gmail.com>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org <mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
>>> Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
>>> 
>>> Hi, Acee,
>>> 
>>> Following up on your note below regarding draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send this document to the IESG?
>>> 
>>> Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been modified since Sept 24, 2015.
>>> 
>> 
>> Yes. The only text modification proposed and to be implemented was done here:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt <https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator-02.txt>
>> 
>> I do not believe there was anything else pending. Do you mean something else?
>> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> Carlos.
>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Acee
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> — Carlos.
>>> 
>>>> On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Acee
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>