Re: [OSPF] WG Last Call for Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3 - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-03.txt

Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> Tue, 12 April 2011 02:42 UTC

Return-Path: <curtis@occnc.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5668AE069F for <ospf@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:42:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([208.66.40.236]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4mi88i-Fep6H for <ospf@ietfc.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harbor.orleans.occnc.com (harbor.orleans.occnc.com [173.9.106.135]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0BC1E069D for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 19:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harbor.orleans.occnc.com (harbor.orleans.occnc.com [173.9.106.135]) by harbor.orleans.occnc.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3C2gqQQ022480; Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:42:52 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from curtis@harbor.orleans.occnc.com)
Message-Id: <201104120242.p3C2gqQQ022480@harbor.orleans.occnc.com>
To: Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com>
From: Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2011 09:19:10 PDT." <4DA329FE.4050108@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:42:52 -0400
Sender: curtis@occnc.com
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Last Call for Supporting Authentication Trailer for OSPFv3 - draft-ietf-ospf-auth-trailer-ospfv3-03.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: curtis@occnc.com
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2011 02:42:55 -0000

In message <4DA329FE.4050108@cisco.com>
Abhay Roy writes:
>  
> We are starting the Working Group Last Call of this revision of the
> subject draft.
>  
> This drafts is intended to be a Proposed Standard. The OSPF WG last
> call will begin today and will end at 5pm PST, April 25th, 2011.
>  
> Abhay/Acee


It is weak with only the 32 bit sequence number.  That said, if there
is concensus for moving forward as-is I have no objection.  It is a
step in the right direction, though IMHO it is too small a step in the
right direction and would not have to be revisited quite as soon if
something more robust were proposed.

Bottom line.  Falls short of what I'd like to see but no objection.

Curtis