Re: [OSPF] IPR disclosures

There are slightly more nuances.  Active contributors have
more responsibility.  The NOTE WELL tries to mention this.
For those truly interested, reading RFC 3979 and RFC 4879
would be useful.

Regards,
Alia

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:59 PM, RJ Atkinson <rja.lists@gmail.com> wrote:

> OSPF Folks,
>
> I think prompt IPR disclosures are important.
>
> My understanding is that anyone aware of -possibly relevant-
> IPR that is held by one’s employer needs to disclose that
> promptly.
>
> Separately, my understanding is that if anyone is aware
> of -possibly relevant- IPR held by a 3rd party
> (e.g. previous employer) needs to make a 3rd party disclosure
> promptly.
>
> I think the above summary is accurate, but the precise
> (and much longer) *official* IETF wording about IPR
> can be found here:
>
>         "http://www.ietf.org/ipr/“
>
>
> In particular, the 3rd-party IPR disclosure web page form is here:
>
>         "https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/new-third-party/“
>
> Yours,
>
> Ran
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>