Re: How many changes can be in one LSA

Alex Zinin <zinin@PSG.COM> Fri, 16 August 2002 22:44 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA03119 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:44:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.006DAF88@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:46:03 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 117624 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:46:01 -0400
Received: from 147.28.0.62 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 18:46:01 -0400
Received: from psg.com ([147.28.0.62] helo=127.0.0.1) by psg.com with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 17fpr0-000KAv-00 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:46:02 -0700
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.51) Personal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
References: <20020815163153.4212.qmail@mail.com> <3D5C86F0.8000103@redback.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <31844444.20020816154432@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 15:44:32 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: Alex Zinin <zinin@PSG.COM>
Subject: Re: How many changes can be in one LSA
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <3D5C86F0.8000103@redback.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Thursday, August 15, 2002, 10:00:32 PM, Acee Lindem wrote:
>> If more than one change occurs in a router for instance: one link changes cost
>> and another link goes down simutaneously, will this two changes be signalled in
>> one LSA or two LSAs will be generated for that ? I mean, is the LSA limited to
>> one change at a time ?

> Hello Beatriz,

> This is somewhat implementation dependent but in general simultaneous
> events should result in a single router LSA re-origination. There is
> no limit to the number of changes that can be contained in a single
> LSA.

Right, and the reason for this is that LSAs do not contain
_changes_, they contain a snapshot of the router's curren state
(the link state in the router-LSA case.)
Just making sure we all are on the same page.

Alex