[OSPF] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: (with DISCUSS)
"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 05 February 2015 13:32 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0522D1A8846; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:32:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OHmY71dh5qyg; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:32:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 899271A87B1; Thu, 5 Feb 2015 05:31:59 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.10.1.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150205133159.32056.782.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 05:31:59 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/5NuJKb70Xn1wSxW-DIE9tfiPdsA>
Cc: ospf@ietf.org, Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>, draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig.all@ietf.org, qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, ospf-chairs@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: (with DISCUSS)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2015 13:32:04 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig-13: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-autoconfig/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4. OSPFv3 interfaces MAY use an arbitrary HelloInterval and RouterDeadInterval as specified in Section 3. Hopefully, an easy DISCUSS. >From a management point of view, we must be able to determine if a router or interfaces within a router are OSPF-autoconfigured. If I'm not mistaken, you miss, in the management considerations section, something like this: The OSPFv3 routers MUST flag the interfaces supporting this specification. Background: I recall one particular tool in the past that would check the different router configs and flag the HelloInterval and RouterDeadInterval mismatched values for adjacent routers. This would be equivalent to the following debug: OSPF: Rcv hello from 192.168.0.2 area 0 from FastEthernet0/0 192.168.0.2 OSPF: Mismatched hello parameters from 192.168.0.2 OSPF: Dead R 40 C 60, Hello R 10 C 15 Mask R 255.255.255.252 C 255.255.255.252 In case of OSPF auto-config, this check doesn't make any sense.
- [OSPF] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf… Benoit Claise
- Re: [OSPF] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Benoit Claise's Discuss on draft-ietf-… Benoit Claise