Re: [OSPF] Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02)

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Mon, 08 May 2017 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3653126BFD for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4oufLWS6M78X for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oi0-x236.google.com (mail-oi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5BBF124B0A for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oi0-x236.google.com with SMTP id w10so66969619oif.0 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 08 May 2017 14:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=PZn+ylRaoylQMb0nKnSZfvobcxU0q2aMdHZy27zfQpc=; b=myaJXyioqv2laI7+zvWX2WivEBZOI0NzdnXur8zdFimJeFBl6ZCWwBjdrKqRxMTtOz 6NmoE2aB8nMTHc/NCzdV8hOXtMH6HVHjMzlmO9JZnXuZj2TlsxbKBoQDvNV80uPPIS9s 519cmCZoq3FfnqCLD5nl9YnEumZRNec/n+CJ+cHQsPrKZfgTQR089Nd6G4c5PSmrj9f4 q9bp++EE1VBrEp+fBkQOdt836nT/0BLzM46XmPxZMAtS2ZmXw8CA5UoBLUYSD1aZYy/l 9aL4L3t5qjBmG6+OCBGw/x6O8udH53EoSnsM91tOXecFft11AmjO/Se1aZd0NUqj65SM F8NQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=PZn+ylRaoylQMb0nKnSZfvobcxU0q2aMdHZy27zfQpc=; b=ShScNAgpNF5TcCU4UQ+1JU2PVa2n22/rcDKXhiTEenYgyObPJbObuP+1pVbf4RNpeB FhsL7/5foHqU9UEkyfXXouUfvoGlZjrC+ggF8wKudnBVklgJPh4bUvLK9733ds0drAVg 8I7n6GDTQQWn2yw13Hum4aVD6oWvgR+vDnoKcMgxswu0YuyH1idTxT88weUDkfvjEwMS uQ8lxV4G9lHaZJdURGDAr1Q3iH3+ZOaPkkWpT6JVswMAq0FmU30+S+hBm09jaO12XLpE V7Zp8TX7owMv0bsaasN2NpocCo/Fxqxo4q7T93WI4p2QKoTY8CcJix4k0xK9r8YX0bGs VC3Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/7QNUO/hVaFpzv29oRklY1hr9DvwJmx0Kv+2fc0BUZdH62kz/bM ae3eGNJ9GABpGpMBDoiN/N165vpKS56oqNs=
X-Received: by 10.157.43.210 with SMTP id u76mr24912180ota.223.1494280152308; Mon, 08 May 2017 14:49:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.52.246 with HTTP; Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <FA749EE9-2DBC-4880-8ECB-A9422EE61F3E@gmail.com>
References: <FA749EE9-2DBC-4880-8ECB-A9422EE61F3E@gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 8 May 2017 14:49:11 -0700
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmUVQ5Z-1J6QrC7dd1j5gmZhKjkG1tOwkz_MNdYrixiAiw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113ade60ac6167054f0a356b
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/5OF2Sgp8nDxhlHAErgmF0pdI5yw>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 21:49:15 -0000

Dear All,
yes/support (readability needs some work)

Couple nits:

   - Introduction.
      - Perhaps "Some networks use tunnels for a variety of reasons, such
      as:" may be re-worded as "There my be number of reasons why
different types
      of tunneling technique has been used in networks, among these are:"
      - "The ingress needs to select a type of tunnel which is supported by
      the egress." I think that the idea is to find match between set
of tunnels
      supported by the ingress and the egress.
   - Section 3
      - s/Routers advertises/Routers advertise/
      - It is stated that "The Encapsulation Capability TLV SHOULD NOT
      appear more than once within a given OSPF Router Information (RI) Opaque
      LSA." What happens when it does appear more than once? Discard LSA? TLV?

Regards,
Greg



>
> *From: *OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of "Acee Lindem (acee)" <
> acee@cisco.com>
> *Date: *Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 07:45
> *To: *"ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *[OSPF] Advertising Tunneling Capability in OSPF
> (draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02)
>
>
>
> This begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your
>  support and/or
>
> comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 12th, 2017.
>
>
>
> For your convenience, here is the URL for the subject document.
>
>
>
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-ospf-encapsulation-cap-02.txt
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Acee
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>