Re: optimization of Opaque LSA
Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Wed, 28 July 2004 02:26 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA28835 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:26:11 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.00E2AE58@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:26:12 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 27881062 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:26:10 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:26:10 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E668C4D11C6 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12728-03 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:26:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aceeinspiron (unknown [172.31.253.63]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02B994D11C8 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:26:06 -0700 (PDT)
References: <BAY15-F39ezf9CIElR300063f83@hotmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Message-ID: <0fe201c4744a$3c15f390$0202a8c0@aceeinspiron>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:26:02 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: optimization of Opaque LSA
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi Shahid, I haven't heard any requirement to shrink the OSPF TE LSAs. One thing to consider is the fact that OSPF TE (RFC 3630) is already a draft standard and is widely deployed. Thanks, Acee ----- Original Message ----- From: "shahid nawaz" <shahid_optical@HOTMAIL.COM> To: <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2004 2:22 PM Subject: optimization of Opaque LSA > Can Any body tell me that Is there any work on the optimization opaque LSA. > Like the unreserved bandwidth has 32 octet, 4 octet for reservable, 4 for > maximum available bandwidth. if Anyone knows please tell me. because i have > an idea of optimization of opaque LSA. > > thakyou very much indeed > > from shahid nawaz > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 helps eliminate e-mail viruses. Get 2 months FREE*. > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus
- optimization of Opaque LSA shahid nawaz
- Re: optimization of Opaque LSA Acee Lindem
- Re: optimization of Opaque LSA Jean Philippe Vasseur