IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 03 June 2016 21:45 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CF3E12D602; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:45:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.947
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.947 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z8OPl20Fr_Tk; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:45:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-1.cisco.com (alln-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.142.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDAD212D0D1; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 14:45:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1734; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1464990304; x=1466199904; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=oY90xYvMJ1jUpvStZRH/KnB7nJezgQTgCf0KlDp+lpc=; b=EzcjMwWP+5WQ+GCRsefAYb98ZDJl0G9keGHQpt03aSNU88L1ZpvV4Ml7 ZgkvZbAJ6v973tdtsJ4sKiRWjTP8Ztb4NbJ0v44MHqpfpYlvdnJNycvDa QHXPvNsGRjFapEs5XJrct9/l3jF8pWEpZzBNygpoVgrD8x7UJxMjqH7fM I=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AaAgC6+VFX/4ENJK1egzpWbw4Gul+BehcNhW4CHIEbOBQBAQEBAQEBZSeERgEBBAEBARoGEToLEAIBCBgCAh8HAgICJQsVEAIEAQ0FiC8OsUqRJwEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBARcFgQGJc4RAgwGCWQWYRQGGAoghgWmET4hkj1EBHjaCOYE1bokTfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.26,414,1459814400"; d="scan'208";a="281557805"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 03 Jun 2016 21:45:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u53Lj2YX016756 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Jun 2016 21:45:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:45:01 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Fri, 3 Jun 2016 17:45:01 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
Thread-Index: AQHRvNegieQTrbGfhUKI6yZAyuKmpp/YSKkA
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 21:45:01 +0000
Message-ID: <D37771EE.6347F%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D375B4D3.631CE%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D375B4D3.631CE%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <79A0BFC463F6C744945F15578302623D@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/5XOvhN1ApyF8NBD1syWOp73-Tmk>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2016 21:45:06 -0000

Authors, 

For the final time, can you confirm whether or not you are aware of any
IPR other than? 

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2401/
https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2233/ (the IPR statement on the non-WG
draft version) 

Thanks,
Acee 

On 6/2/16, 10:04 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

>The WG last call ended a couple weeks ago and I will act as document
>shepherd and request publication.
>Thanks,
>Acee 
>
>On 5/4/16, 11:41 AM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
><ospf-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of acee@cisco.com> wrote:
>
>>The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable
>>implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews.
>>I
>>believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft.
>>
>>With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft.
>>Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th,
>>2016.
>>
>>Here is a URL for your convenance:
>>
>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensio
>>n
>>s
>>/
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Acee
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OSPF mailing list
>>OSPF@ietf.org
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>

v2.27.8 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status