Re: Address Family Support in OSPFv3

Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM> Thu, 10 July 2003 21:53 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id RAA23522 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:53:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <1.00A60A12@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:53:30 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 48082738 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:31:35 -0400
Received: from 171.68.227.75 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 17:31:35 -0400
Received: from smirtoraw2k03 (dhcp-171-69-101-56.cisco.com [171.69.101.56]) by fire.cisco.com (8.11.7+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h6ALVXT10938 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Message-ID: <000301c3472a$a22e2ec0$386545ab@amer.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2003 14:31:33 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: Address Family Support in OSPFv3
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <200307101836.h6AIaP398030@fuinar.juniper.net>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Quaizir,

->Let the customer decide on the tradeoff between
->implementation and maintenance complexity versus efficiency.

I guess we agree on the fact that

- an integrated approach has the advantage of efficiency and optimize
number of LSA, memory, flooding, adjacency

- instance id approach has the advantage of implementation simplicity

I will get the discussion further off line with you guys, I would like
however to hear from customers and operator for their preference

Thanks
Sina