IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644)

Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com> Fri, 07 June 2013 19:59 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@lindem.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83C0221F996A for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:59:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MANGLED_NAIL=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Rm67wXj73WSj for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:59:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com (cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com [75.180.132.120]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBBBF21F9969 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Jun 2013 12:59:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=ffsvOjsF c=1 sm=0 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:17 a=x7FEv9pE1mkA:10 a=qIV9paJqKZ0A:10 a=Wma4Of2gTTwA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=QYaTxUjTAAAA:8 a=Zj9u1qtRmtYA:10 a=BqEg4_3jAAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=OSzkMb4IVOTMhISXKQwA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=mhd2NDuUijAA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=lZB815dzVvQA:10 a=C2g1Hp6idNFTy4K9KrF8yg==:117
X-Cloudmark-Score: 0
X-Authenticated-User:
X-Originating-IP: 65.190.0.120
Received: from [65.190.0.120] ([65.190.0.120:64642] helo=[192.168.1.107]) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from <acee@lindem.com>) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 05/2F-07131-5BB32B15; Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:59:50 +0000
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Acee Lindem <acee@lindem.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130607194649.DFE7B62114@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 15:59:49 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D05F4D3D-528F-4E6B-86AB-914A0CA8AE99@lindem.com>
References: <20130607194649.DFE7B62114@rfc-editor.org>
To: preet.desouza17@gmail.com
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: jmoy@casc.com, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2328 (3644)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2013 19:59:56 -0000

Preet - Can you denote which boxes you changed and why? In its current state, this errata should be summarily rejected. 
Thanks,
Acee 
On Jun 7, 2013, at 3:46 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2328,
> "OSPF Version 2".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2328&eid=3644
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Preet D'Souza <preet.desouza17@gmail.com>
> 
> Section: 2.1.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
>                                       **FROM**
> 
>                 |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|
>                 |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9|
>              ----- ---------------------------------------------
>              RT1|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT2|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT3|  |  |  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT4|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT5|  |  |  |8 |  |6 |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              RT6|  |  |8 |  |7 |  |  |  |  |5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              RT7|  |  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |
>          *   RT8|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |
>          *   RT9|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
>          T  RT10|  |  |  |  |  |7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |0 |  |
>          O  RT11|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |0 |
>          *  RT12|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
>          *    N1|3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N2|  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N3|1 |1 |1 |1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N4|  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N6|  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |1 |  |1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N7|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N8|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |3 |2 |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N9|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |  |1 |1 |  |  |  |  |
>              N10|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |
>              N11|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N12|  |  |  |  |8 |  |2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N13|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N14|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N15|  |  |  |  |  |  |9 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               H1|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |10|  |  |  |  |
> 
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
>                                    **FROM**
> 
>                 |RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|RT|
>                 |1 |2 |3 |4 |5 |6 |7 |8 |9 |10|11|12|N3|N6|N8|N9|
>              ----- ---------------------------------------------
>              RT1|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT2|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT3|  |  |  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT4|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |  |
>              RT5|  |  |  |8 |  |6 |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              RT6|  |  |8 |  |7 |  |  |  |  |5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              RT7|  |  |  |  |6 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |
>          *   RT8|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |  |  |
>          *   RT9|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
>          T  RT10|  |  |  |  |  |7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |0 |  |
>          O  RT11|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |0 |
>          *  RT12|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |0 |
>          *    N1|3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N2|  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N3|1 |1 |1 |1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N4|  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N6|  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |1 |  |1 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N7|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |4 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N8|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |3 |2 |  |  |  |  |  |
>               N9|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |1 |  |1 |1 |  |  |  |  |
>              N10|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |2 |  |  |  |  |
>              N11|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |3 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N12|  |  |  |  |8 |  |2 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N13|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N14|  |  |  |  |8 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>              N15|  |  |  |  |  |  |9 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               H1|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |10|  |  |  |  |
>               Ia|  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |5 |  |  |  |  |  |  |
>               Ib|  |  |  |  |  |7 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
> 
> Notes
> -----
> section 2.1.2
> 
> Page 20, Figure 2 : A sample Autonomous System.
> 
> The interfaces   Ia  and Ib  have not been added to the directed graph.
> By definition of point-to-point links under OSPF, for serial interfaces defined by IP addresses,
> router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ib whereas router RT6 should advertise a stub network to Ia .
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 
> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC2328 (no draft string recorded)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : OSPF Version 2
> Publication Date    : April 1998
> Author(s)           : J. Moy
> Category            : INTERNET STANDARD
> Source              : Open Shortest Path First IGP
> Area                : Routing
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email