Re: [OSPF] [OSPFv3 LSA Extn] Regarding 'Referenced LS Type ' in E-intra-area-prefix LSA

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 01 March 2017 15:05 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30AAE129558; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:05:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.521
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.521 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sCTO8s6-psGV; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 427C012954C; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 07:05:05 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=8588; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1488380705; x=1489590305; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=6AR24PzdN5ua6/yuwrItk/FUuYsygwj4ZhP78CiXM6c=; b=Tu8EadwbtUqFsspsX0akPmewTptv+t/ILz2iYnPHzP4Gi9eZ10FPItLz GkZpyX3cYgUbOFCGunhiD9labeozlLMOAkAkCFofg9EnsJ68M9sgdj/Cu MsWZ718ummT2+SEryBXPaswCIszh1vjUm2byfDaqjWra1wqbUILHlb98/ 0=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ATAQDL4bZY/4wNJK1eGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgm5iYYEJB41ckWaIDId9hSyCDYYiAoI4PxgBAgEBAQEBAQFiKIRwAQEBBC1MEAIBCBEDAQIoByERFAkIAQEEAQ0FiWEDFbQXhzYNg14BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEdizuCUYIjhUUFkBaFXYV7OgGOCIQpgXuFIYoCik2IZwEfOIEBVBU+hQWBSHWIZYENAQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,226,1484006400"; d="scan'208,217";a="390196113"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 01 Mar 2017 15:05:04 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (xch-rtp-012.cisco.com [64.101.220.152]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v21F53sV020647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 1 Mar 2017 15:05:04 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-012.cisco.com (64.101.220.152) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:05:03 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Wed, 1 Mar 2017 10:05:03 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.authors@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.authors@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPFv3 LSA Extn] Regarding 'Referenced LS Type ' in E-intra-area-prefix LSA
Thread-Index: AdKSUoZdGw01T/SbThaVU1VHLUMUwAASqmgA
Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:05:03 +0000
Message-ID: <D4DC4C37.9FDC3%acee@cisco.com>
References: <73BFDDFFF499304EB26FE5FDEF20F78850877B40@blreml501-mbx>
In-Reply-To: <73BFDDFFF499304EB26FE5FDEF20F78850877B40@blreml501-mbx>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.197]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D4DC4C379FDC3aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/5x1DoXaiVc1j72qMOjxfInYduKs>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [OSPFv3 LSA Extn] Regarding 'Referenced LS Type ' in E-intra-area-prefix LSA
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Mar 2017 15:05:08 -0000

Hi Veerendranatha,

From: Veerendranatha Reddy Vallem <veerendranatharv@huawei.com<mailto:veerendranatharv@huawei.com>>
Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 1:19 AM
To: "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.authors@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.authors@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.authors@ietf.org>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv3-lsa-extend.all@ietf.org>>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: [OSPFv3 LSA Extn] Regarding 'Referenced LS Type ' in E-intra-area-prefix LSA
Resent-From: <alias-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:alias-bounces@ietf.org>>
Resent-To: <sina@cisco.com<mailto:sina@cisco.com>>, <akr@cisco.com<mailto:akr@cisco.com>>, Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com<mailto:fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>>, <aretana@cisco.com<mailto:aretana@cisco.com>>, Deborah Brungard <db3546@att.com<mailto:db3546@att.com>>, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com<mailto:akatlas@gmail.com>>
Resent-Date: Wednesday, March 1, 2017 at 1:21 AM

Dear Authors,
The LS Referenced LS Type in E-intra-area-prefix LSA is either E-Router-LSA type (0xA021)  or E-Network-LSA (0xA022), but not regular Router LSA type (0x2001) or Network LSA Type ( 0x2002).
These values in header of E-intra-area-prefix LSA are not same as regular intra-area-prefix LSA's header.

Can you please confirm.

Yes - it is expected that OSPFv3 Extended LSA will be consistently originated within an area. I will make this clear in the next revision as this is different from the RFC 5340 Intra-area-prefix LSA.

Thanks,
Acee



Regards,
Veerendranath