Re: OSPF Capabilities Draft

Peter Psenak <ppsenak@CISCO.COM> Thu, 05 June 2003 19:49 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA14412 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:49:18 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <19.009FBB0F@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:49:17 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 44818252 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:49:15 -0400
Received: from 144.254.15.118 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 15:49:15 -0400
Received: from cisco.com (ppsenak-isdn-home.cisco.com [10.49.2.218]) by strange-brew.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h55JnER21963 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 5 Jun 2003 21:49:14 +0200 (CEST)
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E7E13AAF2F3ED41197C100508BD6A328DD43F4@india_exch.corp.mot.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <3EDF9EBA.6070501@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 21:49:14 +0200
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: OSPF Capabilities Draft
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Vishwas,

Manral, Vishwas wrote:

>Hi Acee,
>
>Are you talking of some sort of a translation mechanism where you have ABR's
>send area-scope LSA's into stub/NSSA for each global scope LSA?
>
>
no. We talked with Acee about a case where NSSA ABR  needs to generate
multiple Capability LSA  - one Type-11 plus one Type-10 per each
stub/NSSA area attached.
Similar to Type-5 plus Type-7 LSAs case on NSSA ABR/ASBR.

thanks,
Peter

>Thanks,
>Vishwas
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Acee Lindem [mailto:acee@REDBACK.COM]
>Sent: Monday, June 02, 2003 19:51
>To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
>Subject: Re: OSPF Capabilities Draft
>
>
>I received one comment from Peter Psenack on this draft. A router
>with attached stub or NSSA areas should also originate an area scoped
>capability LSAs for these area when the domain wide flooding
>option is selected. I think this is a good idea.and will add it
>as we more forward. Any more discussion?
>
>Thanks,
>Acee
>
>Acee Lindem wrote:
>
>
>>The draft draft-raggarwal-igp-cap-0x.txt has been discussed at the
>>last three IETFs. At the last two IETFs, there was mild support and
>>we agreed to take the discussion to the OSPF WG list. In order to remove
>>one of the barriers to making this draft a WG document, I have split out
>>the OSPF specific portion into a separate draft. Rahul has done the same
>>for ISIS.
>>
>><Speaking as a WG Member>
>>
>>I beleive the time has come to accept this as a WG document. The
>>described mechanism is consistent with other OSPF features and is
>>backward compatible. All the OSPF options been have been allocated and
>>new proposal will be able to make use of this mechanism without
>>solving the option bit problem. One example is
>>draft-vasseur-mpls-ospf-te-cap-00.txt.
>>
>></Speaking as a WG Member>
>>
>>Link to draft below:
>>
>>http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-lindem-ospf-cap-00.txt
>>
>>Further discussion? Any opposition to accepting this draft as a WG
>>document?
>>
>>Thanks,
>>--
>>Acee
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>--
>Acee
>
>
>