Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 04 February 2016 19:24 UTC

Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A400B1ACE08; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:24:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.501
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.501 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B3y_iLiC3vIL; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:24:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F28B91ACE01; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 11:24:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=9401; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1454613844; x=1455823444; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=kMdF12jEjV4pTZRsG10Pe6/n+cz5EGCs7Ah0MrYZRbY=; b=aXh7LCkXUZtbC6oyRbVEBZzZiOeg0w7Su1lLIshT1N4cdX1aPQZPvxJF 39zoeXZpMKrPjs+50tLmGDgdAKCffhPmvhuFzvBymn5N+6rhtT3FqINwl 44RbGJzLAb/RjTF4dO0NS0+SjhlIdVQx//FN8HGqtERjUe0S/rT0Ug3WT Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0D4AQCapLNW/4gNJK1egm5MgTAPBohVr?= =?us-ascii?q?m6CEwENgWaGDQIcgSI4FAEBAQEBAQGBCoRBAQEBBCNWEAIBCBEDAQIoAwICAh8?= =?us-ascii?q?RFAkIAgQOBYgGAxKxdYpUDYQ/AQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBFYpJgjeCG?= =?us-ascii?q?4JggToFkmyEBQGLW4FzgVuNFoZ/g2+DUQEeAQFCggMZgUhqhy58AQEB?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,396,1449532800"; d="scan'208,217";a="234980005"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 Feb 2016 19:24:03 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (xch-rtp-020.cisco.com [64.101.220.160]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u14JO2rh024180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:24:02 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-020.cisco.com (64.101.220.160) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:24:02 -0500
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:24:02 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
Thread-Index: AQHRGDvPHGJIFP17wUyU2okv88d/op6USjYAgABifwD//7p/AIAAXH+AgAKYOwCAhciXAP//rjMA
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 19:24:02 +0000
Message-ID: <D2D90F1A.4B992%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D252E730.385E8%acee@cisco.com> <CAG1kdojiU6fzn7XYSSdpfabxMDUQYvbgNNRCjZbraJKq2+WwJQ@mail.gmail.com> <D2668656.3CED2%acee@cisco.com> <c3caff28c3d243b99e523be8bc64719f@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2669DC6.3CF08%acee@cisco.com> <8ef4f51407804a91950ab126277368a6@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <D2691731.3D460%acee@cisco.com> <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <DBFC89CC-221C-42C8-8A11-E0E5A49170EC@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D2D90F1A4B992aceeciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/6ir5F4MxQb91MG8m-s3jUix2Zsg>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2016 19:24:05 -0000

Hi Carlos,

From: "Carlos Pignataro (cpignata)" <cpignata@cisco.com<mailto:cpignata@cisco.com>>
Date: Thursday, February 4, 2016 at 2:16 PM
To: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
Cc: "Les Ginsberg (ginsberg)" <ginsberg@cisco.com<mailto:ginsberg@cisco.com>>, Manav Bhatia <manavbhatia@gmail.com<mailto:manavbhatia@gmail.com>>, "draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>" <draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org<mailto:draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator@ietf.org>>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org<mailto:ospf@ietf.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] More Comments on OSPF S-BFD Discriminator

Hi, Acee,

Following up on your note below regarding draft-ietf-ospf-sbfd-discriminator, could you request publication and send this document to the IESG?

Has the document been updated with the proposed text? It hasn’t been modified since Sept 24, 2015.

Thanks,
Acee


[BTW, its sibling document on ISIS is already in IESG ballot.]

Thanks!

— Carlos.

On Nov 11, 2015, at 4:16 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com<mailto:acee@cisco.com>> wrote:

I was more concerned about the consumer of the information than the IGPs. I did look at base S-BFD draft and I agree this unspecified. Let’s go forward than with the proposed text and I will request publication.

Thanks,
Acee