Re: [OSPF] IPR Call for "H-Support for OSPFv2"

["Manish Bhardwaj (manbhard)" <[e-mail]>]

No IPR I am aware of.

-Manish.

On 6/26/17, 3:50 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
<[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:

>Corrected draft alias - reply to this one.
>
>On 6/26/17, 6:45 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
><[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>
>>Authors,
>>
>>If you are listed as a document author or contributor, please respond to
>>this email stating whether or not you are aware of any relevant IPR. The
>>response needs to be sent to the OSPF mailing list. The document will
>>not advance to the next stage until a response has been received from
>>each author and each individual that has contributed to the document.
>> 
>>
>>Thanks,
>>Acee
>>
>>
>>
>>On 6/14/17, 3:48 PM, "OSPF on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
>><[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>>
>>>The question of OSPFv2 complete blocking of transit routing support
>>>(similar to OSPFv3) seems to come up every year or so. I¹d like to WG
>>>last
>>>call this document. Does anyone see any issues?
>>>Thanks,
>>>Acee 
>>>
>>>On 6/14/17, 12:44 PM, "OSPF on behalf of [e-mail]"
>>><[e-mail] on behalf of [e-mail]> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
>>>>directories.
>>>>This draft is a work item of the Open Shortest Path First IGP of the
>>>>IETF.
>>>>
>>>>        Title           : H-bit Support for OSPFv2
>>>>        Authors         : Keyur Patel
>>>>                          Padma Pillay-Esnault
>>>>                          Manish Bhardwaj
>>>>                          Serpil Bayraktar
>>>>	Filename        : draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03.txt
>>>>	Pages           : 8
>>>>	Date            : 2017-06-14
>>>>
>>>>Abstract:
>>>>   OSPFv3 defines an option field for router-LSAs known as a R-bit in
>>>>   RFC5340.  If the R-bit is clear, an OSPFv3 router can participate in
>>>>   OSPF topology distribution without acting as a forwarder to forward
>>>>   the transit traffic.  In such cases, an OSPF router would only
>>>>accept
>>>>   traffic intended for local delivery.  This draft defines R-bit
>>>>   functionality for OSPFv2 defined in RFC2328.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit/
>>>>
>>>>There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>>>https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03
>>>>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03
>>>>
>>>>A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>>https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-ospf-ospfv2-hbit-03
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
>>>>submission
>>>>until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>>Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>>ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>OSPF mailing list
>>>>[e-mail]
>>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>OSPF mailing list
>>>[e-mail]
>>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>OSPF mailing list
>>[e-mail]
>>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>_______________________________________________
>OSPF mailing list
>[e-mail]
>https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf