Re: [OSPF] [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> (Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks) to Experimental RFC

Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com> Mon, 17 June 2013 09:56 UTC

Return-Path: <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643AE21F9B90 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:56:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.877
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.877 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.721, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZPt0LhsRf26e for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:56:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-f180.google.com (mail-pd0-f180.google.com [209.85.192.180]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90E0F21F9814 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 10so2593900pdi.25 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZRVvWzeyDaF3cI6+NlpISM+QJY3hmlcT/T/LnpI/5VY=; b=zC8OmzVMMRJ09KFpkSaLOMq80DUwG8jpxGiKywDroOOrgvefShIn4YG9Z95KC2Wl0o de8zSYCR83W3SecLfXQR79C4uXi8ErQfIHNNXZ2DGp3Vsevg8+kLrEmg2Re0Jn+8vG8y /IRz0gAapBlFdXEBu0BI3YyV5V+pySSNqXpN7R3A5n3SJOd7nYUuo5ljEHC7YMNu142B ICo5HtH36QYVNpey8Tl9hyIii6eoqHfpWg25+E6liyzeaXj4F32VfbmaYVFvX0iEfxkn +vTDfXw4S+U85iKwHPbyLsL9PTXHzmgbo09kjGGud/cC5oacru3R1jV7+S2RQCBkZaWP CLnA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.68.203.103 with SMTP id kp7mr4455106pbc.165.1371462982240; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.78.164 with HTTP; Mon, 17 Jun 2013 02:56:22 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4717B686@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
References: <20130605150955.25672.65454.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <090201ce629e$9712a760$c537f620$@olddog.co.uk> <CADnDZ8-d6bzbJ9RHPwg-=zwFxRhegRdUrGoSTAipr3Qf2sd5yA@mail.gmail.com> <2ED1D3801ACAAB459FDB4EAC9EAD090C10142BC9@xmb-aln-x03.cisco.com> <CADnDZ8-KQczRwQUecukyyXRcNKY47UQZmDF6v-wEf5S5gudwXg@mail.gmail.com> <94A203EA12AECE4BA92D42DBFFE0AE4717B686@eusaamb101.ericsson.se>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 10:56:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CADnDZ88cTmeEPeV1JqvEorsLJT3PCaA4jrfJJ8J1dZHq7LzXPQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Abdussalam Baryun <abdussalambaryun@gmail.com>
To: Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15af5de113d204df569bb2
Cc: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] [manet] Last Call: <draft-ietf-ospf-manet-single-hop-mdr-03.txt> (Use of OSPF-MDR in Single-Hop Broadcast Networks) to Experimental RFC
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 09:56:33 -0000

Hi Acee,

I distinguish between the word MANET and OSPF they are not the same thing
but all are for same IETF. One is a network and the other is a protocol, so
the network is more general than a protocol in terms of applicability. The
RFC5614 is specification related to the MANET network, but I know that this
WG done the work, but I always think it is important to have joint work
between related WGs participants not separation within IETF. All RFCs are
for the same IETF so they should be related some how.

Abdu


On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 10:57 PM, Acee Lindem <acee.lindem@ericsson.com>wrote;wrote:

> Abdu,
>
> This is an extension to an existing OSPF specification (FRC 5614). Even if
> it weren't, the OSPF WG has no mandate to adhere to RFC 5444 or any other
> MANET WG documents. Since this work was previously done in the OSPF WG,
> there is no reason to even consider bringing it to MANET (although we
> welcome their review).
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On Jun 16, 2013, at 3:40 PM, Abdussalam Baryun wrote:
>
> > The following were first of my comments on the document and I got some
> answers;
> >
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15401.html
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15418.html
> >
> > Answers
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/manet/current/msg15408.html
> > http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg79931.html
> >
> > As a request from the chair and for wg information, after I got to be
> > subscribed in this WG. Thanking you,
> >
> > AB
> > _______________________________________________
> > OSPF mailing list
> > OSPF@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>