IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: FW: Last Call: Detecting Inactive Neighbors over OSPF Demand

Abhay Roy <akr@CISCO.COM> Wed, 28 May 2003 22:53 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id SAA28518 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:53:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <23.009EA734@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:53:27 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 43977035 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:53:25 -0400
Received: from 171.71.177.238 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Wed, 28 May 2003 18:53:25 -0400
Received: from mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (IDENT:mirapoint@mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com [171.71.163.14]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4SMrN9x014258 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:53:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from irp-view7.cisco.com (irp-view7.cisco.com [171.70.65.144]) by mira-sjc5-b.cisco.com (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.3.3-GR) with ESMTP id AHO06583; Wed, 28 May 2003 15:50:31 -0700 (PDT)
References: <LISTSERV%2003052814524118@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM> <3ED509DA.C7720CAB@earthlink.net> <3ED516E3.35CF71BB@earthlink.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.52.0305281550290.22012@irp-view7.cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 15:53:22 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Abhay Roy <akr@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: FW: Last Call: Detecting Inactive Neighbors over OSPF Demand
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <3ED516E3.35CF71BB@earthlink.net>
Precedence: list

Mitchell,

Why it MUST not exceed 1hr? Today it's infinity, so in theory any
interval (including absurdly high ones) should be allowed.

Regards,
-Roy-

On 05/28/03-0700 at 1:06pm, Erblichs writes:

> Sorry group,
>
>         I forgot..
>
>         E) If ..ProbeInterval is kept, its max value MUST not exceed
>            1 hr..
>
>         I think this follows that if we haven't heard from our
>         nbr in 1 hr "he" is considered dead.
>
>         Mitchell Erblich
>         -------------------

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status