IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll "OSPF Link Overload"

Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 30 November 2017 04:05 UTC

Return-Path: <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53E9112778E for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e2YLDIubtwhc for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6589C1201F8 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id o130so28286179itg.0 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:26 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=34y2o5vfvb57LmCfD9fcBpducUgwVXFIDTN3/5QNv3g=; b=rpCKzgvzUN6P6+UkUVGibzrogiBJjtnzZPs3h9PPE8xPfawlbu4HyZSkUvD7Q2H+Xj pXl7TckpNMQMy1tHuj7TXCFJgdrqCiOEgmYpA6z6goCc3z0I5kVtXOxRt1E3UGD63PcZ A9PWqPHCHFHPyRw1rBPe9YoEzs8JqcaficmtfJJrhnj+buanz/9+O0o56opcOyYY5yy5 Cfxa//HoHxDSAcsb9F7en1k/I+hfZsTFDsPViaYexEA6hCkBChaDN/H6KSBKtDOew3bq cU2Ib0fzDo3uyI0OGSvsW0HolOrwlD62WGT+Ok0bc0HrlZwJtKKft8liQqW550OtR/ho OVUw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=34y2o5vfvb57LmCfD9fcBpducUgwVXFIDTN3/5QNv3g=; b=eq5SeXqVh5MqmH1YUW2N8C80eI6xV90KahiMiOReRl6NcgMrw5vbPUw+i09FJSiyVl P8BMR+pGrbCicPEKXqKFhdJ4QGc5oHpE1vlUb25EOvkaf3b8xnIoA8pDKL1psbAs+vEN qRmAvpMSrFxl1Wz4MqbWyu2P4GC+Em18xWJK9AtPIRCu8SdLOtdSNJVh13aWb9/W9zv2 TBz06KTVPeKmXDG+xwUWq2KMlDCNYYEwdZozkvuYiiMASFeDv2gxqZTgyJxe9d9kyBBI vtJcmexaA8irP/9t4dP38SeeRNgl9YfQiTeWJa4CKOFvR4J+pfl7gdQHUgpqu1U24Yjv Q9JQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX52k7IyIwoFC1mSA1o//YK/FG1WHUqhyjOFqaCP5WcPQC8FKm2r BTR29vJJIYipezVubldQYOZaVGl/g+u6zuEOYgU=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMaA0O6dxlJkyB/ZiqxqI5gcI44ksyn8OnRlxhgMNtljWIvuJKJ6phuk0yu4q9aaHcN4KrWv0crqpWDH91Sft6s=
X-Received: by 10.36.95.14 with SMTP id r14mr1414898itb.42.1512014725709; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.2.140.69 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Nov 2017 20:05:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <D642DAC4.DBF10%acee@cisco.com>
References: <D642DAC4.DBF10%acee@cisco.com>
From: Pushpasis Sarkar <pushpasis.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 09:35:25 +0530
Message-ID: <CAEFuwkgMOUW1V8tU-soM8fAJYGmbQwr8Yn+FE+1YBHQ5XBny=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1144b57a9f0501055f2b5c39"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/8WRP6qf1l9ws6pizoDn5W0r3n9A>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] IPR Poll "OSPF Link Overload"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 04:05:28 -0000

Hi Acee,

Sorry for the delay. My day job has been keeping me busy.

I am not aware of any IPRs other than the ones already disclosed.

Thanks
-Pushpasis


On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hi Pushpasis,
> Please respond to the IPR poll. All other authors have responded.
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Acee Lindem <
> acee@cisco.com>
> Date: Saturday, October 21, 2017 at 1:50 PM
> To: "draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-link-
> overload@ietf.org>
> Cc: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
> Subject: [OSPF] IPR Poll "OSPF Link Overload"
>
> Authors,
>
> Please indicate whether you are aware of any relevant IPR and if so,
> whether it has been disclosed.
>
> The following IPR has been disclosed:
>
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/search/?submit=draft&id=
> draft-ietf-ospf-link-overload
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
>

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status