[OSPF] draft-berger-ospf-rfc2370bis-00.txt
Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> Thu, 16 November 2006 20:03 UTC
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GknSd-0006qm-Al; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:47 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GknSc-0006qh-7Z for ospf@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:46 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GknSa-00032V-TG for ospf@ietf.org; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:46 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2006 12:03:44 -0800
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kAGK3hOF000558 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:43 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kAGK3hDM014893 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:43 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.38]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:43 -0500
Received: from [10.82.208.5] ([10.82.208.5]) by xfe-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:43 -0500
Message-ID: <455CC41E.8040607@cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 15:03:42 -0500
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: OSPF List <ospf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Nov 2006 20:03:43.0251 (UTC) FILETIME=[51190630:01C709BA]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=741; t=1163707423; x=1164571423; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:=20Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com> |Subject:=20draft-berger-ospf-rfc2370bis-00.txt |Sender:=20 |To:=20OSPF=20List=20<ospf@ietf.org>; bh=NBlXrpSo12Eo9Wuqj70tSEFfCWMpb+iF5Xq98fmLqqw=; b=gVsARZMQesfgzBLdhlavbwESGvstfp0W9pIEdfc+FKxkfvt5453JqByHstHhDqafau3gc49L G7l8qO3kKrYkUCvPTwkZS4DZwkwfxVUKqvaa6FbmzzI0HqHqF8m91ssZ;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=acee@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 856eb5f76e7a34990d1d457d8e8e5b7f
Subject: [OSPF] draft-berger-ospf-rfc2370bis-00.txt
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org
The authors of the subject draft presented a problem with AS scoped opaque LSA reachability validation Montreal and we asked them to go back and respin Rob Coltun's RFC 2370 since it is preferable to have a single draft tha covers opaque LSAs comprehensively than an addendum. The result of this work is the subject draft and it was presented in San Diego. Does anyone have objections to this being a WG document? The requirement has to fix the validation has been discussed for approximately 6 months and, heretofore, no one has disputed it. Consequently, I ask for objections prior to Nov 22, 2006. Note that once it is a WG document, the content is still subject to review, discussion, and modification. Thanks, Acee _______________________________________________ OSPF mailing list OSPF@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
- [OSPF] draft-berger-ospf-rfc2370bis-00.txt Acee Lindem