Re: Regarding route calculation over Vlink in case of O
Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Wed, 28 July 2004 02:48 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id WAA29790 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:48:53 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <17.00E2AEBD@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:48:53 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 27884691 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:48:46 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:48:45 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2A5B4D11CC for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 15157-06 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:48:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aceeinspiron (unknown [172.31.253.63]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0506B4D11C0 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 19:48:42 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20040722092734.32401.qmail@mailweb34.rediffmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Message-ID: <103701c4744d$63d8c170$0202a8c0@aceeinspiron>
Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 22:48:39 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: Regarding route calculation over Vlink in case of O
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> Is RTA an ABR? I think the configuration of a virtual link implies that. > Your topology doesnt specifies that. Vlink should not be operational. > In any case next hop should be RTB. I agree. Specifically, it should be the link local address of interface e1 on RTB. OSPF and OSPFv3 implemenations do not normally install any recursive routes. An exception may be OSPF sham links (depending on how one interprets the L3VPN draft). Thanks, Acee On Wed, 21 Jul 2004 prasanna s wrote : >Iam running OSPFv3 in the following topology > > vlink > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > + + > RTA(e1)-------(e1)RTB(e2)------(e2)RTC(e3)------|2000:cccc::1/128 > area 1 area 1 area 0 > >In this scenario, What should be the next hop for the route 2000:cccc::1/128 >in the routing table of RTA >Is it link-local address of e1 of RTB or >Global/site-local ipv6 address of e2 of RTC or >Null > >Thanx and regards > >Prasanna Kumar A.S >Software Engineer >Huawei Technologies India Pvt Ltd >Level-3 & 4 ,Leela Galleria, >The Leela Palace,No.23 Airport Road. >Bangalore-560 008 >Mobile : 98803-34587 >phone(0ff): 5217474/5217152 ext 701 > > >***************************************************************** >This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! >***************************************************************** > >