Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com> Tue, 26 August 2014 09:49 UTC

Return-Path: <mach.chen@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E7511A6F1A for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:49:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.868
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.868 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.668, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dL2trtMn6zYI for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:49:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BE731A6F0F for <ospf@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 02:49:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg01-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BLU09369; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:49:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.72.34) by lhreml402-hub.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.241) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.158.1; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:49:39 +0100
Received: from SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.57]) by SZXEMA402-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.82.72.34]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:49:33 +0800
From: Mach Chen <mach.chen@huawei.com>
To: Abhay Roy <akr@cisco.com>, "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
Thread-Index: AQHPwJgLZNZrvLKhYUaKLbzvDqPwzZvipNHg
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:49:33 +0000
Message-ID: <F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE25DA8D200@SZXEMA510-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <53FB8718.1090003@cisco.com> <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <53FB89B0.2040407@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.111.97.72]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_F73A3CB31E8BE34FA1BBE3C8F0CB2AE25DA8D200SZXEMA510MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/9wdjZ065UaR5PEpCfgAASvERuMM
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 09:49:53 -0000

Support.

Best regards,
Mach

From: OSPF [mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Abhay Roy
Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 3:09 AM
To: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: [OSPF] Poll for WG adoption of draft-xu-ospf-routable-ip-address

This is a simple document with a few strong drivers (ELC and S-BFD) requiring it..

Please share your support or objections in making it a WG document.

Regards,
-Abhay
On 8/25/14, 11:57 AM, Abhay Roy wrote:
[speaking as WG member]

Two comments..

1. Section 3 has this text - "This TLV is only applicable to OSPFv2.".
    I believe, this should also be applicable to RFC5838, i.e. for IPv4 AF's

2. Section 3 and 4 describes the scope as SHOULD be domain-wide. I personally don't see any real use cause of any lessor scope (Area or Link) since we have mechanisms to generate routable IP address for those scopes already. So I would suggest we limit the scope of this document to be "MUST be domain-wide". Any concerns with that?

Regards,
-Abhay




_______________________________________________

OSPF mailing list

OSPF@ietf.org<mailto:OSPF@ietf.org>

https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf