Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunnel-adjacency-00.txt
Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM> Thu, 12 June 2003 16:18 UTC
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA17287 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:18:21 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from PEAR.EASE.LSOFT.COM (209.119.0.19) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <18.00A10A6E@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:09:53 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 45429791 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:09:47 -0400
Received: from 171.68.227.73 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:09:46 -0400
Received: from smirtoraw2k03 (sjc-vpn4-120.cisco.com [10.21.80.120]) by fire.cisco.com (8.11.6+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id h5CG9f014319 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4024
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4910.0300
Importance: Normal
Message-ID: <016a01c330fd$07d2a3d0$386545ab@amer.cisco.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 09:09:40 -0700
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Sina Mirtorabi <sina@CISCO.COM>
Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunnel-adjacency-00.txt
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <20030611232940.CAC2E3D25@xmxpita.excite.com>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Don Thanks for the comments, please see in line ->-----Original Message----- ->From: Mailing List [mailto:OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM] On ->Behalf Of Don Goodspeed ->Sent: Wednesday, June 11, 2003 4:30 PM ->To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM ->Subject: Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunnel-adjacency-00.txt -> -> ->Sina, Peter, -> ->Just got done reading the draft and had a few ->questions/comments. On the whole, this looks like a solid proposal. -> ->1. Encapsulation (section 4): Should section a) be a ->"should"? Could it be acceptable to always encapsulate? It could be acceptable -> ->2. Section 4 clause b, last sentence. "all implementation" ->should be plural. yes -> ->3. Areas: clarify what to call the area that is not the ->transit area. In section 5, call out that the TA is announced ->as an unnum p2p link in <insert term here>, as opposed to the ->TTA as it could be read. Maybe "associated area" or "native area"? Yes we can use "associated area", that is the area for which TA is configured -> ->4. Section 5, Link Data - is this the IP address used to ->transmit the TA data over, or could it be a loopback interface? As for VL, Link Data is set to the virtual interface's IP address, which is the interface through which TA control packet are sent, however I would imagine that if one set it to a loopback ( as long as it belongs to transit area ) it should be fine -> ->5. Should we call out that the TTA and the "native area" ->cannot be the same area? I did not see this prohibition anywhere. Yes it need to be explicitly mentioned -> ->6. Cost of the TA - for using the TTA intra-area cost, do you ->propose using a special metric setting (zero?) or a separate ->field/toggle for allowing this (admin cost/oper cost?). By default the advertised cost of the TA is the intra-area cost to TA endpoint, if you manually set the cost you will overwrite this cost and advertise this configured cost for your TA adjacency. As for any interface the cost must be greater than zero. ->7. Consistency in sections 6 thru 9 in reference to [1]. ->Section 6 does not even contain a reference. In all ->sections, should you call out section numbers? Yes, we can mention this in the next version -> Do you intend ->the interface and adjacency FSMs to adhere to the regular ->ones or the virtual ones? Virtual Thanks Sina -> ->Thanks, ->Don -> ->_______________________________________________ ->Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com ->The most personalized portal on the Web! ->
- I-D ACTION:draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunnel-adjacency-… Internet-Drafts
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunnel-adjace… Don Goodspeed
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-mirtorabi-ospf-tunnel-adjace… Sina Mirtorabi