Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Fri, 16 October 2015 14:39 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5791B2CA4; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:39:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nZVG6VYi-6ai; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-6.cisco.com (alln-iport-6.cisco.com [173.37.142.93]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D60D1B2CA3; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:39:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=781; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1445006367; x=1446215967; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-id:content-transfer-encoding: mime-version; bh=HwFpzDK3UZMWtOdu2LPSjsBQhA13CTZa4eUh75TKQLc=; b=aEXcpnxoVaKRvtu8loGVdLA1ivz/LvmMEt6rUEpTjudJxFaVNJO6ksTl FNTtP3G138kABPjLMLhT1RupD1QrN36mamm/CC3s3/1Qv7SpZyOEv0+B/ yV33UucWAt3CgyWJ7kwi8v8wxz3fcd8NH2x/mpEvDKFuiJB+4UVnXAXfg s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0AVAgBoCyFW/49dJa1dgyaBQga5RoQhAQ2BWYYeAoExOBQBAQEBAQEBgQqEJwEBBHkQAgEIGC4yJQIEAQ0FiC7DTAEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReGdgGEfYUNB4QuAQSNSIUOg0cBjRqcDwEfAQFCghEdFoE/cYRhgQYBAQE
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.17,689,1437436800"; d="scan'208";a="198581234"
Received: from rcdn-core-7.cisco.com ([173.37.93.143]) by alln-iport-6.cisco.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2015 14:39:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (xch-aln-011.cisco.com [173.36.7.21]) by rcdn-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t9GEdQAo022379 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:39:26 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-011.cisco.com (173.36.7.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:39:11 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.000; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 09:39:10 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Rob Shakir <rjs@rob.sh>, "Shraddha Hegde" <shraddha@juniper.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHRBcJuCumG1ZA/D0Cj5vEpcyU0Zp5sUYCAgAAuTQCAAbA8AP//5uGAgABXaoD//9NAgIAARAuAgAABgoD//779AA==
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:39:10 +0000
Message-ID: <D2468413.DBF91%aretana@cisco.com>
References: <20151013142127.29680.19611.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BY1PR0501MB1381AA752314C8677284A2F5D53E0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D244F4BA.DB9E8%aretana@cisco.com> <BY1PR0501MB1381A540ECC4E6F62651BF6ED53D0@BY1PR0501MB1381.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <D2464C12.DBDFA%aretana@cisco.com> <etPan.5620f609.42befee7.19d1@piccolo.local> <D2467F6C.DBF6D%aretana@cisco.com> <etPan.5621091b.7b9078ae.ae6d@jivecommunications.com> <D24681AA.36A15%acee@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D24681AA.36A15%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.117.15.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-ID: <669254B130C3F2489D877E0B6C6726F5@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/BFX8ZKxRS_Inp4Xs7g40KNKUj2w>
Cc: "ospf@ietf.org" <ospf@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.ad@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.ad@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.shepherd@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag.shepherd@ietf.org>, "ospf-chairs@ietf.org" <ospf-chairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-ospf-node-admin-tag-07: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 14:39:28 -0000

On 10/16/15, 10:31 AM, "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> wrote:

Hi!

>This is a great discussion! It is unfortunate that it did not occur
>earlier on the OSPF WG list.

Couldn't agree more! :-)

. . .
>On 10/16/15, 10:26 AM, "Rob Shakir" <rjs@rob.sh> wrote:
>
>>. . .
>>I prefer leaving "MUST be considered unordered² in the document, I
>>currently cannot envisage any use cases that would need to consider
>>ordering (in general, I think this can be dealt with by creating a new
>>tag).
>
>In thinking about this and case of nondeterministic behavior with varying
>implementation ordering, I think we should keep it as unordered and
>discourage the creation of policies that are sensitive to ordering.

Ok..that's fine with me.

Thanks!

Alvaro.