Re: RFC3509 applicability (Alternative Implementations of OSPF Area Border Routers)

tajay <tajay@NETD.COM> Tue, 12 July 2005 13:23 UTC

Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DsKjr-0002UH-S4 for ospf-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:23:55 -0400
Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA21203 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:23:54 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <23.010A2D16@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 9:23:54 -0400
Received: by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 14.4) with spool id 78828399 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:23:53 -0400
Received: from 203.196.196.74 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0m) with TCP; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 09:23:51 -0400
Received: from netd.com ([10.91.0.11]) (authenticated bits=0) by BLR-MAIL.NETD.COM (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id j6CDPrq3031818 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:55:55 +0530
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20030225
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <44CF9D8D25966C4DB1072958419273DB406828@aunswa002.au.tcnz.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-NetD-India-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the NetD-India Sysadmin for more information
X-NetD-India-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: tajay@netd.com
Message-ID: <42D3C3AE.6020301@netd.com>
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2005 18:50:46 +0530
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: tajay <tajay@NETD.COM>
Subject: Re: RFC3509 applicability (Alternative Implementations of OSPF Area Border Routers)
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
In-Reply-To: <44CF9D8D25966C4DB1072958419273DB406828@aunswa002.au.tcnz.net>
Precedence: list
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

yeah,
cisco follows rfc 3509 implemetation. You can find this by doing simple 
tests on cisco router..
thanks
ajay
Paresh Khatri wrote:

>Hi all,
>
>Does anyone know if the Cisco implementation still follows ABR behaviour as documented in this RFC ?
>
>Thanks,
>Paresh
>
>This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If 
> you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please 
> contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of 
> this communication or disclose anything about it.
>
>  
>