draft-ishiguro-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-01.txt

"Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM> Sat, 19 October 2002 08:49 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA28548 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:49:29 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from walnut (209.119.0.61) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <18.00780999@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 4:51:40 -0400
Received: from DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM by DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 315421 for OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:51:40 -0400
Received: from 12.27.183.253 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0f) with TCP; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:51:40 -0400
Received: by XOVER.dedham.mindspeed.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id <4B0H38RF>; Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:51:40 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Message-ID: <E7E13AAF2F3ED41197C100508BD6A328791869@india_exch.hyderabad.mindspeed.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:53:50 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM>
From: "Manral, Vishwas" <VishwasM@NETPLANE.COM>
Subject: draft-ishiguro-ospf-ospfv3-traffic-01.txt
To: OSPF@DISCUSS.MICROSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

Hi Kunihiro Ishiguro,

I have the following comments: -

1. Section 4. states that  "Link State ID of Intra-Area-TE-LSA should be the
interface ID of the link".

If we are assuming that we have only one top level TLV in each LSA(as in
Katz-yeung) we should state the exception in case of such an LSA.

2. If we are using "neighbor-ID TLV" for point-to-point links also, we
should not need a Remote-Interface-IPv6 Address TLV, becuase we can easily
identify the other end of the link using the Interface ID.

Besides it would be nice to state we can support unnumbered links that way
in the document. Unlike katz-yeung which states "This document also does not
support unnumbered links"
Thanks,
Vishwas