Re: [OSPF] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: (with COMMENT)

Hi Mirja, Authors, et. al,
I have question about allocating new LSA type number for TTZ LSA for
Experimental document from IETF Consensus/IETF Review, as suggested in
Section 14, rather than from the Private Use range.
Or, which may be the best route, partition the Private use range into
Experimental and Private and then allocate the new value out of the
Experimental range.

Regards,
Greg

On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 9:34 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
wrote:

> Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-ospf-ttz-05: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-ttz/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Questions on IANA section (not an OSPF expert, so please excuse me if I
> misunderstood something):
> - Don't you have to register both LS types 9 and 10 somehow?
> - And do the "Types for new TLVs in the new TTZ LSA" create a new
> registry or is this an existing one?
>
> Other minor comments:
> - What's a DR? Please spell this out!
> - There is only little normative language used in this doc. Potentially
> some more normative language could make things clearer. However I don't
> have concrete proposals what to change and I believe the most important
> parts are in normative language. So there is no urgent need to change
> anything but maybe another check would be good to make sure normative
> language is used where needed.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>