[OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Wed, 04 May 2016 15:47 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A16412D7CA; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:47:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.517
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.517 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ybOITrXWtH3E; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:47:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from alln-iport-5.cisco.com (alln-iport-5.cisco.com [173.37.142.92]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B9712DA55; Wed, 4 May 2016 08:41:28 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=690; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1462376488; x=1463586088; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=4pSt34bXgAqfF5xbRbWXpFbJsUzdDtZ2/zFsdTOABHI=; b=SPfSBka5dXHbcA1rvaagSR/P/x/wy/MOwCXXorGmM2eKggiG9y6pG0at DFwQf2E3CYT8f0HB3VBFivp2PIBDSx1eti0eNAkS4dMxztHAjwYURvwxB YBqaVhwZhEYDPodvrVUhpU/oAG0SkXvA11+4zDSfCVeBj3GrCtRStiCVf c=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0ARAgDvFipX/4ENJK1egzhTgQO3U4IPAQ2BdSSFbB6BGTgUAQEBAQEBAWUnhEgdBhFFEgEiAh8HAgQwFRIEDogvDqwqkQQBAQEBAQEBAwEBAQEBAQEBARMEfJEwglkFmBkBhXuIHIFSFoRNiF6PMwEeAQFCgjaBNYgpfwEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.24,577,1454976000"; d="scan'208";a="267727524"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by alln-iport-5.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 04 May 2016 15:41:27 +0000
Received: from XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (xch-rtp-013.cisco.com [64.101.220.153]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id u44FfRYn025180 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Wed, 4 May 2016 15:41:27 GMT
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com (64.101.220.155) by XCH-RTP-013.cisco.com (64.101.220.153) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1104.5; Wed, 4 May 2016 11:41:26 -0400
Received: from xch-rtp-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) by XCH-RTP-015.cisco.com ([64.101.220.155]) with mapi id 15.00.1104.009; Wed, 4 May 2016 11:41:26 -0400
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
Thread-Index: AQHRphtrmKmlLOn4hUS3HYB9goqNXA==
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:41:26 +0000
Message-ID: <D34F9064.5F631%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.116.152.196]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <2C76127ED6C48D478DF3693B8E640D36@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/BwtkbFFJvy5Jse7GvSppCUdWWgo>
Cc: "draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions@ietf.org>
Subject: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extensions for Segment Routing - draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions (Correct Draft Authors E-mail)
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 15:47:20 -0000
The subject draft is very stable, has multiple interoperable implementations, and many (including myself) have done thorough reviews. I believe we are ready for WG last call for this very important draft. With great pleasure, this begins the WG last call for the subject draft. Please send your comments to this list prior to 12:00 AM GMT, May 19th, 2016. Here is a URL for your convenance: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-ospf-segment-routing-extensions / Thanks, Acee
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Dolganow, Andrew (Nokia - SG)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Acee Lindem (acee)
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Rob Shakir
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Hannes Gredler
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Peter Psenak
- Re: [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Exten… Stefano Previdi (sprevidi)
- [OSPF] Working Group Last Call for OSPF Extension… Clarence Filsfils