[OSPF] OSPF WG poll for adoption of draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te
"Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com> Fri, 03 April 2015 15:46 UTC
Return-Path: <acee@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11EAD1ABD38 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:46:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wnAG-XI6MNfJ for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com [173.37.86.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6AC831ABD36 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 08:46:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=760; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428075982; x=1429285582; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:content-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=9p3fvJheBG7II3EwTqjOeW3XRLY6eONZ8F5239i2YRk=; b=bD9LExdWIg0vKlARxbaTamLKWhh5NEJjCzG3TPmv6nb0fTqBOcnNZuFv 4EIUXEDMxN0Zd1xq1FoDLpzK7sl+8FMpFkcMOx+ZXL3NtRCwtXWcbBwU5 jXh/Pub9Dj9hZuhEtHXvfxeMfbge7SS7w/CF4vVI4/IlwbG2lpbvDodbq M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8BQCOtR5V/4wNJK1cgwuBM4MQyHaBE0wBAQEBAQF+hCUjEVcBIgImAgQwFRIEiEKlP49UmBMBAQEHAQEBAR6BIY4sg0SBRQWQa4oAgR2PZ4NIIoNvgjN/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,518,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="405870044"
Received: from alln-core-7.cisco.com ([173.36.13.140]) by rcdn-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2015 15:46:00 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by alln-core-7.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t33Fjxpd003957 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <ospf@ietf.org>; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 15:45:59 GMT
Received: from xmb-aln-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.1.236]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:45:58 -0500
From: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>
To: OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: OSPF WG poll for adoption of draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te
Thread-Index: AQHQbiVHPGB7cx4dW0qbewYQ7ub8gw==
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:45:58 +0000
Message-ID: <D14423E7.149D4%acee@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.24.102.13]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <32E961474B03CA43BF55F3A33FF12B7F@emea.cisco.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/Cj8uCNBc2SO9fDO2A27fmPc54MM>
Subject: [OSPF] OSPF WG poll for adoption of draft-smirnov-ospf-xaf-te
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 15:46:23 -0000
After this document was presented in London, we discussed making this a WG document. It seems to make a lot of sense given that even if you are running OSPF and OSPFv3, you really do not have to advertise TE information in both - you can simply advertise your endpoints. Also, there is really nothing that forces your OSPFv2 control plane and your IPv6 TE plane to be congruent as long routing domain is not fragmented. Hence, at this time I’m starting an OSPF WG poll for adoption. The poll end at 12:00 AM on April 18th. Thanks, Acee
- [OSPF] OSPF WG poll for adoption of draft-smirnov… Acee Lindem (acee)