Re: Two queries on calculating AS external routes

[Paresh Khatri <[e-mail]>]

Thanks for all your replies, guys.

Regards,
Paresh.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mailing List [mailto:[e-mail]]On Behalf Of Acee
Lindem
Sent: Sunday, 10 July 2005 03:16 AM
To: [e-mail]
Subject: Re: Two queries on calculating AS external routes


Pat Murphy - [phone] wrote:

>Paresh,
>
>  
>
>>In my case below, what if the two LSAs are not quite
>>functoinally equivalent i.e what if the LSAs have the same
>>destination, same cost etc but have different non-zero
>>forwarding addresses ? What happens then ?  Do the same
>>tie-breaker rules apply or will it be implementation-dependent ?
>>    
>>
>
>The tie breaker rules are not applied. Here the installation 
>decision process is the same regardless of whether it is 
>comparing two Type 5 LSAs, or a Type 5 and a Type 7 LSA, or two 
>Type 7 LSAs. Whether or not both are installed depends on the 
>pruning done in step (c) as defined in RFC 2328 Section 16.4.1.
>  
>
Conceivably, you still could end up with LSAs with differing forwarding 
addresses of equal
cost and equivalent path preference for the prefix. I don't believe this 
case is covered. However,
since the forwarding address costs are equal, I don't think there should 
be any loops.

>Pat
>
>  
>


This communication, including any attachments, is confidential. If 
 you are not the intended recipient, you should not read it - please 
 contact me immediately, destroy it, and do not copy or use any part of 
 this communication or disclose anything about it.