Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"

[prz <[e-mail]>]

 <lots of "yes, needed and will be done" ... cut out :->

>>
>> So, overall I think we agree on scope of the problem that needs to 
>> be
>> addressed so we get a coherent set of standards out
>
> so would you agree to make this a WG document?

 Hey Peter,

 yes, given the backward compat section addresses all the issues and the 
 signaling states/transitions are properly
 written down as you indicated I see how the idea has merit to be taken 
 on. I do see some holes in what you suggest
 as behavior but that can be discussed through/ironed out.

 And yes, from all I gathered so far there seems to be some unnumbered 
 4203 around and needs to be paid attention to.

 --- tony