Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"

prz <prz@zeta2.ch> Thu, 11 May 2017 16:43 UTC

Return-Path: <prz@zeta2.ch>
X-Original-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30564129442 for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZQVvny_tKr5l for <ospf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from zeta2.ch (86-172-254-80.static.dsl-net.ch [80.254.172.86]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95255129AF9 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 May 2017 09:37:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from www.zeta2.ch (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: prz) by zeta2.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AEAD2CC6C; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:37:19 +0200 (CEST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 09:37:18 -0700
From: prz <prz@zeta2.ch>
To: Peter Psenak <ppsenak@cisco.com>
Cc: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, OSPF WG List <ospf@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <59142717.80909@cisco.com>
References: <D530EF1D.ACB7C%acee@cisco.com> <D53106AD.ACBA9%acee@cisco.com> <c74bd39c55533350e96a1884b7ed9af1@zeta2.ch> <D5320E98.ACF48%acee@cisco.com> <cd38c9344603d9733413bda06ccc6003@zeta2.ch> <D5337994.AD4ED%acee@cisco.com> <c5fb4ee5708a4caab2029943dd2e8eae@XCH-ALN-001.cisco.com> <7eea417112171448d368d007ae0a5da4@zeta2.ch> <D5352E8F.ADC9D%acee@cisco.com> <60799ba9ffb14830d775f19dd05b7e26@zeta2.ch> <59119FD0.4050109@cisco.com> <d56d13731a9c647e78b8d10e300362d0@zeta2.ch> <59142717.80909@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <b0f436ff98b12e441f36e46adc95d403@zeta2.ch>
X-Sender: prz@zeta2.ch
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/0.4.2
X-MailScanner-ID: AEAD2CC6C.A6753
X-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore: s
X-MailScanner-From: prz@zeta2.ch
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ospf/DF58JJ1OMRosGYrEe-IZbyo-mJE>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ospf/>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 May 2017 16:43:56 -0000

 <lots of "yes, needed and will be done" ... cut out :->

>>
>> So, overall I think we agree on scope of the problem that needs to 
>> be
>> addressed so we get a coherent set of standards out
>
> so would you agree to make this a WG document?

 Hey Peter,

 yes, given the backward compat section addresses all the issues and the 
 signaling states/transitions are properly
 written down as you indicated I see how the idea has merit to be taken 
 on. I do see some holes in what you suggest
 as behavior but that can be discussed through/ironed out.

 And yes, from all I gathered so far there seems to be some unnumbered 
 4203 around and needs to be paid attention to.

 --- tony