Re: [OSPF] draft-kini-ospf-fast-notification-01

Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 04 April 2011 20:34 UTC

Return-Path: <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ospf@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C49C3A67D3 for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:34:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.320, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Zs9sTmN7XXs for <ospf@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pv0-f172.google.com (mail-pv0-f172.google.com [74.125.83.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D1B23A67D2 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:34:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pvh1 with SMTP id 1so982355pvh.31 for <ospf@ietf.org>; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:36:12 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=HUd7SmulLe6dJSk51McbIGAdOEiNnHh8EC6U2W27euc=; b=gNZKCfWQk3mA2qfRMUeN+2DohAjBpLwpD6hlHp1A1IwtOECMXy2zXyJn6HzCa7bJ3m RFfRKGQSFFpsaRhM/MTuHLN1+MpwGByQW8DCEZtZkitPUTM5mAx3r0DLhKESRoysGApf AZJMSh5ky4l2RL8LTGCoLRy8l8DoJvjmxlTZ4=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=e+Eo0X5w3Fd7E/vXYVxLbSbU8Z/yOOo5q39C2BRJvim4EvZtc0a8ORgBF9wvsR6jlX vDGrv2BfrNuEC/zWnW8uhmgUhTBDiMTsWNpHfBPiIKBBlzVbjYKLAsIwPWcwsjDfERcz BbcvjroTlvsbhErPMWnaj3axwigqr6IWHg8T4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.143.85.1 with SMTP id n1mr6773256wfl.349.1301949371905; Mon, 04 Apr 2011 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.68.43.71 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:36:11 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <201104042033.p34KXDqG024310@harbor.orleans.occnc.com>
References: <201104042033.p34KXDqG024310@harbor.orleans.occnc.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 13:36:11 -0700
Message-ID: <BANLkTinCQ=saW1OUt2i8PAfdUPE8_-G_fg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Vishwas Manral <vishwas.ietf@gmail.com>
To: curtis@occnc.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [OSPF] draft-kini-ospf-fast-notification-01
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 20:34:30 -0000

On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Curtis Villamizar <curtis@occnc.com> wrote:
Hi Curtis,

> Has anyone measured the per hop flooding delay that is incurred in
> modern routers?

>From the few we have worked, it works from 10's of nanoseconds to microseconds.

You may see some work on
http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-ospf-te-delay-00. We need to
actually add per device delay to make the solution generic, which is
what we are trying to work on.

Thanks,
Vishwas