Re: [OSPF] WG Adoption Poll for "OSPF LLS Extensions for Local Interface ID Advertisement"

Julien,

- I don't know if there is any implementation that uses the solution 
proposed in RFC 4203. I sent a query to the WG list and so far I have 
not heard about a single one.

- there is not even IANA registry created for the Sub-TLVs of the Link 
Local TLVs and there is no IANA value reserved for Link Local Identifier 
TLV as defined in RFC4203.

So at the end we may not even have any duplication at all.

regards,
Peter

On 24/05/17 10:54 , Julien Meuric wrote:
> Hi Acee,
>
> There is indeed overwhelming support on the feature. However, reading
> this brand new -01 (thanks for the advertisement) and the necessary
> backward compatibility section it had to include, I wonder if this I-D
> is specifying a solution to a problem vs. creating new issues...
>
> More generally, we should clarify how much we, as community, are ready
> to duplicate protocol extensions/codepoints on a solely "repurposing"
> basis. If there is a risk of redefining all extensions originally
> specified for the TE use-case, we must right now discuss where to
> globally draw the line between what we may accept and what we will not.
> Otherwise, we will jump onto a controversy each time a new parameter set
> is tackled in a dedicated I-D.
>
> Please note there are some other ways forward in the Routing area. For
> (random) example, PCEP has been repurposed from a its original scope to
> encompass capabilities to push state. To do so, some features and
> objects had to be repurposed, but the specification managed to reuse the
> original ones, avoiding any backward compatibility considerations...
>
> Regards,
>
> Julien
>
>
> May. 23, 2017 - acee@cisco.com:
>> The WG adoption poll has concluded and there is overwhelming  support
>> for this document.
>>
>> Additionally, https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ppsenak-ospf-lls-interface-id-01.txt addresses
>> the comments received the adoption poll.
>>
>> Authors,
>>
>> Please republish the document as draft-ietf-ospf-lls-interface-id-00.txt.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Acee
>>
>> From: OSPF <ospf-bounces@ietf.org <mailto:ospf-bounces@ietf.org>> on
>> behalf of Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com <mailto:acee@cisco.com>>
>> Date: Thursday, May 4, 2017 at 2:45 PM
>>
>>
>>      This draft was presented in Chicago and there was acknowledgment
>>      that a solution was needed. The authors have asked for WG adoption
>>      and we are now doing a WG adoption poll. Please indicate your
>>      support or objection by May 20th, 2017.
>>
>>      Thanks,
>>      Acee
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
> .
>