Re: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs?

Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com> Mon, 13 November 2006 18:57 UTC

Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GjgzP-00007d-Ox; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:57:03 -0500
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjgs1-0005yF-ES for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:49:25 -0500
Received: from sj-iport-4.cisco.com ([171.68.10.86]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Gjgfb-0002kX-Qm for ospf@ietf.org; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:36:39 -0500
Received: from rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com ([64.102.121.158]) by sj-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP; 13 Nov 2006 10:36:34 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: i="4.09,418,1157353200"; d="scan'208"; a="2218559:sNHT69381414"
Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com (rtp-core-2.cisco.com [64.102.124.13]) by rtp-dkim-1.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id kADIaY0n025210; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:36:34 -0500
Received: from xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-211.cisco.com [64.102.31.102]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id kADIaYDO008839; Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:36:34 -0500 (EST)
Received: from xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) by xbh-rtp-211.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:36:34 -0500
Received: from [10.82.208.5] ([10.82.208.5]) by xfe-rtp-202.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:36:33 -0500
Message-ID: <4558BB31.6070208@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2006 13:36:33 -0500
From: Acee Lindem <acee@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.8 (Windows/20061025)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: GOODSPEED Don <Don.Goodspeed@alcatel.com>
Subject: Re: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs?
References: <67FBA6A55FF15B46B8B572062529D26A10ACB3@USDALSMBS03.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
In-Reply-To: <67FBA6A55FF15B46B8B572062529D26A10ACB3@USDALSMBS03.ad3.ad.alcatel.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2006 18:36:33.0659 (UTC) FILETIME=[A4C75CB0:01C70752]
DKIM-Signature: v=0.5; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; l=1314; t=1163442994; x=1164306994; c=relaxed/simple; s=rtpdkim1001; h=Content-Type:From:Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version; d=cisco.com; i=acee@cisco.com; z=From:=20Acee=20Lindem=20<acee@cisco.com> |Subject:=20Re=3A=20[OSPF]=20Priority=20driven=20processing=20of=20ASE=20 LSAs? |Sender:=20 |To:=20GOODSPEED=20Don=20<Don.Goodspeed@alcatel.com>; bh=pXHAJuxLyzM2qj1WW9zX6sV50/j9hJDzhDFfj0Iu264=; b=opyXnJK6t+B3r+DOJez+3AaFFfMpablBiO5zsnPmRLveVGyFN+z1iykk2CHCmqTrGQ3pZzhM aIWdfpKAz1Bo9kfdXiI6af5PK3NnY4KASzw1MGAEW8mAsFsLFAnDLSLA;
Authentication-Results: rtp-dkim-1; header.From=acee@cisco.com; dkim=pass (s ig from cisco.com/rtpdkim1001 verified; );
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 50a516d93fd399dc60588708fd9a3002
Cc: ospf@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ospf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: The Official IETF OSPG WG Mailing List <ospf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/ospf>
List-Post: <mailto:ospf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf>, <mailto:ospf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ospf-bounces@ietf.org

Thanks Don - I agree totally, this is not an area subject to 
standardization.
Acee
GOODSPEED Don wrote:
> Mukul,
>
> The ordering and such of how routes are installed in a FIB
> (any forwarding table) is extremely vendor-specific (and
> vendor-unique).  As this is a vendor-agnostic forum, you
> probably won't be receiving any responses (at least not
> public ones).
>
> Cheers,
> Don
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mukul@uwm.edu [mailto:mukul@uwm.edu] 
> Sent: Monday, November 13, 2006 2:18 AM
> To: ospf@ietf.org
> Subject: [OSPF] Priority driven processing of ASE LSAs?
>
> Hi all,
>
> I apologize for this out-of-scope question. I know Cisco's IS-IS
> implementation
> supports priority-driven processing of advertised IP prefixes.
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/iosswrel/ps1829/products_feature_
> guide09186a00801b2285.html
>
> I was wondering if some OSPF implementations support similar
> priority-driven
> processing of ASE LSAs?
>
> Thanks,
> Mukul Goyal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
> _______________________________________________
> OSPF mailing list
> OSPF@ietf.org
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf
>
>   

_______________________________________________
OSPF mailing list
OSPF@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ospf