IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-ospf-scalability-08.txt

Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM> Sun, 01 August 2004 20:29 UTC

Received: from cherry.ease.lsoft.com (cherry.ease.lsoft.com [209.119.0.109]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id QAA22933 for <ospf-archive@LISTS.IETF.ORG>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:29:26 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from vms.dc.lsoft.com (209.119.0.2) by cherry.ease.lsoft.com (LSMTP for Digital Unix v1.1b) with SMTP id <7.00E32549@cherry.ease.lsoft.com>; 1 Aug 2004 16:29:24 -0400
Received: from PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM by PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM (LISTSERV-TCP/IP release 1.8e) with spool id 28604599 for OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:29:22 -0400
Received: from 155.53.12.9 by WALNUT.EASE.LSOFT.COM (SMTPL release 1.0i) with TCP; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 16:29:22 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DB99860B2 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from prattle.redback.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (prattle [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02916-06 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:29:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aceeinspiron (unknown [172.31.253.49]) by prattle.redback.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9B31C9860B1 for <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>; Sun, 1 Aug 2004 13:29:20 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20040729094922.8084.qmail@mailweb34.rediffmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01C477E4.AE8CFA20"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at redback.com
Message-ID: <004d01c47806$35e36b50$dd828182@aceeinspiron>
Date: Sun, 01 Aug 2004 16:29:13 -0400
Reply-To: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
Sender: Mailing List <OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM>
From: Acee Lindem <acee@REDBACK.COM>
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-ospf-scalability-08.txt
To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM
Precedence: list

It could. Hopefully the OSPF congestion is a short-lived burst of activity due
to some network event. IMHO, any OSPF network that is in a steady state of 
congestion will have problems no matter what one does. 
 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Vivek Dubey 
  To: OSPF@PEACH.EASE.LSOFT.COM 
  Sent: Thursday, July 29, 2004 5:49 AM
  Subject: draft-ietf-ospf-scalability-08.txt


  Section 2:
  Recommendations :
  4) Implicit Congestion Detection and Action Based on That:
  Could this recommendation be affected by "global synchronization" as seen in TCP networks. 

  -Vivek

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email